76
EMISSIONS GAP REPORT 2018 – REFERENCES
Flues, F. and Thomas, A. (2015) The Distributional Effects of Energy Taxes: Preliminary Report. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 23, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Flues, F. and van Dender, K. (2017a) Permit allocation rules and investment incentives in emissions trading systems. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 33, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Flues, F. and van Dender, K. (2017b) The impact of energy taxes on the affordability of domestic energy. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 30, Paris: OECD Publishing.
FOEN (2017) CO2 levy. Federal Office for the Environment. 11 May 2016. Available at:
https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/ en/home/topics/climate/info-specialists/climate-policy/
co2-levy.html
Frondel, M., Kambeck, R. and Schmidt, C.M. (2007) Hard coal subsidies: A never-ending story? Energy Policy, 35(7), 3807–3814.
Fullerton, D. (2011) Six distributional effects of environmental policy. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 31(6), 923–929.
Gerasimchuk, I., Bassi, A.M., Ordonez, C.D., Doukas, A., Merrill, L. and Whitley, S. (2017) Zombie energy: Climate benefits of ending subsidies to fossil fuel production. Geneva: Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Golub, A.A., Fuss, S., Lubowski, R., Hiller, J., Khabarov, N., Koch, N., Krasovskii, A., Kraxner, F., Laing, T., Obersteiner, M., Palmer, C., Piris-Cabezas, P., Reuter, W.H., Szolgayová, J., Taschini, L. and Wehkamp, J. (2018) Escaping the climate policy uncertainty trap: options contracts for REDD+. Climate Policy, 18(10).
Golub, A., Lubowski, R. and Piris-Cabezas, P. (2017) Balancing Risks from Climate Policy Uncertainties: The Role of Options and Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. Ecological Economics, 138(C), 90–98
Gössling, S., Fichert, F., Forsyth, P. and Niemeier, H.M. (2017) Subsidies in aviation. Sustainability, 9(8), 1295.
Goulder, L. H. (1995) Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157–183.
Goulder, L.H. and Hafstead, M.A.C. (2013) Tax Reform and Environmental Policy: Options for Recycling Revenue from a Tax on Carbon Dioxide. Discussion Paper. Resources for the Future. Government of Alberta (2018) Carbon Levy and Rebates. Available at:
https://www.alberta.ca/climate-carbon-pricing.aspx
Haberl, H. et al. (2012) Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy policy, 45, 18–23.
Hafstead, M., Metcalf, G.E. and Williams III, R.C. (2017) Adding quantity certainty to a carbon tax through a tax adjustment mechanism for policy pre-commitment. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. F., 41, 41.
Hagen, A. and Schneider, J. (2017) Boon or Bane? Trade Sanctions and the Stability of International Environmental Agreements. Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics, Vol. 403, No. 17, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics.
Harding, M. (2014) Personal Tax Treatment of Company Cars and Commuting Expenses: Estimating the Fiscal and Environmental Costs. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 20, Paris: OECD Publishing.
High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices (2017) Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Washington DC: World Bank.
Hirth, L. and Steckel, J.C. (2016) The role of capital costs in decarbonizing the electricity sector. Environmental Research Letters, 11(11), 114010.
Hsu, S.L., Walters, J. and Purgas, A. (2008) Pollution tax heuristics: An empirical study of willingness to pay higher gasoline taxes. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3612–3619.
IEA (2015) Energy and Climate Change: World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris: International Energy Agency. IEA (2017) World Energy Outlook 2017. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Jain, A., Agrawal, S. and Ganesan, K. (2018) ‘Lessons from the world’s largest subsidy benefit transfer scheme: The case of liquefied petroleum gas subsidy reform in India’. In: Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H. eds. The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakob, M. and Marschinski, R. (2013) Interpreting trade-related CO2 emission transfers. Nature Climate Change 3(1), 19–23.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112
