search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REGULATIONS 45


Cosmetic Ingredient Review and EU update


 Dr Martin Perry – Advanced Development and Safety Laboratories Limited, UK


This article looks at the final safety assessments issued by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel during 2018. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel meets four times a year. The safety assessments in this article are from the 146th, 147th, 148th and 149th meetings of the panel. The article also looks at the amendments that have been made to the European Cosmetic Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 in 2018.


Alkane diols The Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel assessed the safety of 10 alkane diols and found that seven of them: Propanediol, 1,5-Pentanediol, Hexanediol, 1,10- Decanediol, Methylpropanediol, Butyl Ethyl Propanediol and Isopentyldiol are safe in cosmetic products in the present practices of use and concentrations as described in their safety assessment.1


For three alkane


diols (1,4-Butanediol, 2,3-Butanediol, and Octanediol) there was insufficient information to determine their safety in cosmetic products.


Malic acid


The Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel last reviewed the safety of Malic Acid and sodium malate in 2001. In 2001 they concluded that malic acid and sodium malate were safe to use as pH adjusters in cosmetic products. The panel decided to


May 2019


re-open the safety assessment as the number of uses and concentrations of Malic Acid and Sodium Malate had increased. The panel concluded that Malic Acid and Sodium Malate are safe in the present practices of use and concentrations as described in their amended safety assessment.2


For Malic Acid the panel


considered its use at concentrations of up to 2.1% in leave-on products and 50% in products diluted for baths. For sodium malate the panel considered its use at 0.02% in skin care products.


Peppermint derived ingredients In 1998 the Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel issued a report that concluded Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Oil, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Extract, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf and Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) water are safe in cosmetic products. After 15 years the Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel re-evaluated the conclusions to this report and decided to review the safety of peppermint derived ingredients. In their 2018 report they concluded that Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Oil, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Extract, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Cell Extract, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Extract, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Juice and Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Water


are safe in cosmetic products in the present practices of use and concentrations as described in their safety assessment when formulated to be non-sensitising.3


The


panel concluded that there was insufficient data to determine the safety of Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Flower/Leaf/Stem Water and Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Meristem Cell Culture in cosmetic products.


Sultaines


The Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert panel reviewed the safety of 13 alkyl sultaines and concluded that they are safe in the present practices of use and concentration.4


Sultaines are structurally


related to betaines and are predominantly used as antistatic agents, surfactants, skin conditioning and hair conditioning agents. Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine has the highest reported maximum concentration of the alkyl sultaines and is used at up to 11.5% in rinse–off products and 2.5% in leave–on face and neck products. Alkyl sultaines may contain amine impurities such as 3,3-Dimethylaminopropylamine which may cause sensitisation but these are reported to be at very low levels that sensitisation is considered to be unlikely.


Witch hazel The Cosmetic Ingredient Review expert


PERSONAL CARE NORTH AMERICA


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88