search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Insight


MACAU MdME Lawyers


Rui Pinto Proenca, Managing Partner, MdME


Rui Pinto Proença is Managing Partner of MdME Lawyers and head of the firm’s Corporate and M&A practice. He specializes in mergers and acquisitions and also focuses on the gaming sector where he regularly acts for gaming companies in Macau and across Asia-Pacific region assisting government in emerging markets developing their gaming policies and regulatory frameworks. Rui is the global chair of the Lex Mundi Gaming Solution, a network of law firms covering over 25 gaming jurisdictions around the world and a member of the Board of Trustees of the IAGA.


www.mdme.com.mo rpp@mdme.com.mo


Macau Gaming Concessions: A case for licence extensions


The six contracts at the epicentre of this discussion are no less than the very legal instruments that allowed for the growth of the Macau gaming industry in the past 20 years. From a total GGR of US$2.9bn (in 2002) the sector now represents an unimaginable US$36.5Bn per annum (in 2019), accounting for more than 75 per cent of the total tax revenue of this relatively tiny region of China.


When this article goes to print, we will be approximately 20 months out from the expiration of the existing concession (and sub-concession) contracts between the Macau government and the current casino operators. Tese are SJM, MGM, Melco, Wynn, Galaxy and Sands


Twenty months may seem like plenty of time to address what is, in its essence, a licensing issue. However, as recent global experience has demonstrated, a lot may change rapidly so, for all the stakeholders involved, this deadline looms just around the corner…


In fact, the six contracts that are at the epicentre of this discussion are no less than the very legal instruments that allowed for the growth of the Macau gaming industry in the past 20 years. From a total GGR of US$2.9bn (in 2002) the sector now represents an unimaginable US$36.5bn per annum (in 2019), accounting for more than 75 per cent of the total tax revenue of this relatively tiny region of China.


Tese contracts have not only shaped the operators into the gaming powerhouses they are today, they have also changed the face (and the faith) of Macau. What is at stake then is not simply the future of each


P100 NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA


of the companies involved but rather the prosperity of Macau and its people. And, as most industry veterans would recognise, both require a delicate balance that has been carefully crafted over the past two decades.


WHAT ARE THESE PIVOTAL DOCUMENTS?


In short, a concession contract is a civil law instrument used in the Portuguese legal system as the preferred way for the government to outsource services considered essential to the public (the provision of water and electricity, waste management, etc.). It is also used to allow the commercial operation of activities that, although not being of direct public interest, can be as profitable as they are socially costly. Casino gaming is the latter.


For these reasons, the operation of games of chance for profit is an activity reserved by law to the Macau Government; it may only be pursued by private


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144