INSIGHT IAGA SUMMIT WASHINGTON DC - MAY 28-30 What the
future holds M&A Financing
Paul Richardson, Managing Partner at Partis, reflects on the future
trends and challenges for financing mergers and acquisitions of public or private companies in the gaming industry ahead of his IAGA Summit panel.
What does the future hold on financing mergers or acquisitions of public or private companies when interest rates decrease?
Tere are substantial funds in the private equity community waiting to deploy and gaming businesses with their strong cashflow potential are a favourite sector. However the availability and cost of leverage (debt) has dramatically limited this to date. It seems that the market is turning though as the Silver Lake bid for Endeavour has clearly shown. Sometimes when the deal is just that good, the numbers can be made to work regardless. With valuations in the UK and Europe at a remarkable discount to those in the US (a function perhaps of the ESG requirements of investors as much as the ongoing cost of living and regulatory pressures), I fully expect to see dealmaking for EU/UK targets by both private equity and North American strategic buyers ramp up over the coming months.
Why did SPACs fail so quickly?
In a nutshell, quality and quantity. For every successful SPAC deal (like Draft Kings) there were too many poor quality SPACs transacting (or trying to) with lower quality assets. In a low cost of capital environment where SPAC investors had no real opportunity cost to the capital they committed to a SPAC, it was relatively simple for the early SPACs to close a deal. As interest rates rose and the quality of the assets being brought forward to SPAC meant that it was in the interests of the investors to block a deal and withdraw their money they had committed to date (rather than following it
P56 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS
into the deal with further funds). Redemptions in SPACs (which had a finite lifetime to secure a deal and bring it to investors) snowballed and the market pretty much shut down within a few months.
What M&A activity might lie ahead in pre- regulated jurisdictions and those in the early stages of regulation
Paul Richardson Managing Partner Partis Capital
“Brazil has set its online tax rate at a level which is going
to encourage investment and drive a substantial return to the tax man. How long will it be before India, China etc decide that there is so much money going offshore via VPNs and Crypto that it is worth regulating and taxing it at home. There is precedent in Macau - but it needs a local to champion it...” Paul Richardson
Brazil is on the cusp of regulation for igaming and betting and is keeping all of the advisory community very busy as those international operators who are not already there on a (pale) gray basis are now frantically trying to find a local partner or acquistion to allow them to launch with the benefit of local knowledge, brand and a database. Expect to see a raft of deals as we move closer to a full launch towards the end of the year. We are starting to hear interest in India (where DFS and Rummy are significant and the off-shore betting on cricket may be the largest single-sports betting market globally) although there is so far nothing much coming from government. Still further away is China although again, people are starting to think about what they may need in terms of product and operational expertise should that change. At the heart of all of this is the key driver of gambling legislation, taxation. Brazil has set its online tax rate at a level which is going to encourage investment and drive a substantial return to the tax man. How long will it be before India, China etc decide that there is so much money going offshore via VPNs and Crypto that it is worth regulating and taxing it at home. Tere is precedent in Macau - but it needs a local to champion it...
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160
