INSIGHT US IGAMING
Perceptions Play’n GO
Sitting down with G3 Media, Magnus Natt och Dag, North American Commercial Director at Play’n GO, discusses the slow regulatory rollout of iGaming
relative to sports betting, changing the perceptions of lawmakers and consumers, and the double sided nature of game exclusivity - a significant factor in the US iGaming industry.
Could you provide an overview of Play'n GO's US operations?
Play’n GO aims to be active in all regulated markets around the world. around the world. In the US specifically, Play’n GO has iGaming licenses in six of the seven states. We will apply for the seventh jurisdiction, Rhode Island, in the near future. We are also live in four of those six jurisdictions, MI, NJ, WV & PA, and anticipate being live in all US jurisdictions before year end.
US iGaming is in its infancy stages for content suppliers, operators, and regulators. What has Play'n GO learnt so far?
More states have been legalising and regulating online gambling, including casino games, poker, and sports betting. Tis trend has been driven by a desire to capture tax revenue, provide consumer protection, and address the demand for online gaming. Many states are looking for additional streams of tax revenue in the post-pandemic era, as federal aid has come to a screeching halt.
Following the Supreme Court's decision in P36 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS
2018 to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which had previously restricted sports betting to just a few states, many states have moved to legalise sports betting.
We at Play’n GO had hoped for and anticipated that the iGaming regulation would follow the same path as the sports betting regulation did. So far, this has not been the case, and only one new state, Rhode Island, legalised iGaming in 2023. Tis creates a bigger fight for a smaller than anticipated market for both operators and suppliers.
Tere has been a flurry of partnerships and mergers between iGaming operators, technology providers, and traditional casino companies. Tese collaborations aim to leverage each other's strengths, expand market reach, and enhance the overall gaming experience for consumers. Te landscape here is a competitive one though- we have seen leading European and US operators exiting the US market, such as WynnBet, Unibet and 888.
Content suppliers, including game developers
and software providers, have been entering the US market to offer a diverse range of games and platforms. Tis competition has driven innovation and led to a proliferation of gaming options for consumers. Despite the progress, there have been regulatory challenges at both state and federal levels. Issues such as responsible gaming measures, age verification, anti-money laundering compliance, and interstate cooperation have posed challenges for regulators and operators alike.
Te expansion of iGaming has also raised concerns about its social impact, including addiction, underage gambling, and the potential for increased problem gambling behaviours. Public perception and attitudes toward online gambling continue to evolve as policymakers and stakeholders grapple with these issues.
We’re trying to address this issue head on. We want lawmakers and consumers to view our products as entertainment, the same way they view a trip to the movies or an evening at the theatre. We are continually asking to be regulated and taxed.
Changing
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160