search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Insight


RECRUITMENT & RETENTION Compliable


Chris Oltyan, CEO, Compliable


Compliable offers US sportsbooks a way to onboard and manage employees’ gaming licenses across multiple states, which cuts the time needed to get staff licensed from weeks to days, lowers the workload for compliance teams, reduces the costs related to licensing, and accelerates moving into new markets at a time when first mover advantage is critical. The company formerly operating under the name Rebric and completed a US$1.7m seed funding round in May, 2021.


Compliance: time consuming, repetitive and painful process?


After hundreds of Zoom calls with folks from different industries, we found ourselves talking with FanDuel and discovered the huge problem that they were having around getting team members licensed across jurisdictions. After further research, we learned that this was a widespread problem in the sports betting space and realised that we could actually repurpose a lot of our existing technology to solve those pains.


Online sportsbook employees in the US have to fill out over 60-page forms for multiple states in order to do their job. It is the roll of compliance teams to track all those forms and make sure they are completed correctly, all whilst keeping in touch with regulators across the jurisdictions in which they operate as regulations and forms are constantly changing.


With sportsbooks metaphorically jostling for first mover advantage as states continue to throw open their sports betting doors, onboarding vendors and affiliates are overwhelming stretched compliance teams with questions about navigating this complex landscape.


Chris Oltyan, CEO of Compliable, explains how his company's technology removes this hand-holding. Other than the time saved for compliance teams and licensees, Chris believes the biggest potential benefit may actually come from helping operators being ready to go the very second a new state goes live.


Could you tell us about Compliable and the journey that the company has been on since being under the guise of Rebric?


As Rebric, we had been building good momentum with some anti-money-laundering technology in the FinTech space. Our momentum screeched to a halt once Covid hit, and we realised we needed to shift to an industry that was growing during the pandemic.


After hundreds of Zoom calls with folks from different industries, we found ourselves talking with FanDuel and discovered the huge problem that they were having around getting team members licensed across jurisdictions. After further research, we learned that this was a widespread problem in the sports betting space and realised that we could actually repurpose a


P40 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


lot of our existing technology to solve those pains. Why focus solely on the US?


Sports betting in the US has only really started to grow in the past three years, since the US Supreme Court struck down PASPA in 2018. In the surge that followed, each state that decided to legalise betting passed their own laws for granting organisational, vendor, and employee licenses.


In such a fast-growing market, these complexities make software like ours absolutely essential for multi-state operators who want to get to market quickly in emerging jurisdictions and win market share. While many of our current customers are based overseas, their existing licensing is nothing compared to the explosive complexity that the US market has unleashed.


What challenges do US sportsbooks face in securing, onboarding and managing employees' gaming licenses?


For one of our large sportsbook customers, it had been taking five weeks for new customer support employees to fill out and submit all the complex forms and fulfil other requirements to apply for the gaming licenses they needed to do their jobs. Licensees would fill out forms incorrectly and consequently have their forms rejected by regulators.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118