This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Project: A2953 Client: East Anglia Offshore Wind Limited Title:


East Anglia THREE– Navigation Risk Assessment 26 Future Case with Windfarm


26.1 Commercial Shipping Estimated Future Case 389. Over recent years the vessel arrivals and tonnages at the ports closest to the East Anglia THREE site have decreased (see Section 7.5).


390. No proposals have been identified which are likely to significantly impact the volume of shipping in the vicinity of the windfarm, other than that associated with the offshore windfarm developments in the area.


391. However, given the uncertainty associated with long-term predictions of this nature including the potential for any major new developments in UK or Transboundary ports, a conservative (i.e., high) potential growth in shipping movements of 10% was estimated over the life of the windfarm.


26.2 Commercial Fishing Estimated Future Case


392. The Commercial Fisheries Assessment (Chapter 14 Commercial Fisheries) considered the potential changes to the fishing baseline over the life of the development. It is recognised that this is a speculative exercise due to the numerous unpredictable direct and indirect factors which could materially affect fisheries. A 10% increase in fishing activity has been assumed.


26.3 Recreational Estimated Future Case 393.


In terms of recreational vessel activity, there are no major developments known of


that would increase the activity of these vessels in the area. Based on the discussion presented, the future level of activity has been assumed to increase by 10% compared to the current levels.


26.4 Collision and Allision Probabilities


394. The potential increase in vessel activity levels would increase the probability of ship- to-structure allisions (both powered and drifting). Whilst in reality the risk would vary by vessel type, size and route, it is roughly estimated this would lead to a linear 10% increase in the base case allision risks.


395. The increased activity would also increase the probability of vessel-to-vessel encounters and hence collisions. Whilst this is not a direct result of the proposed windfarm, the increased congestion caused by the site and potential displacement of traffic in the area may have an influence. Again, a 10% overall increase is assumed.


26.5 Risk Results Summary


396. The base case and future case annual levels of risk without and with the proposed East Anglia THREE project are summarised in Table 26.1 and Table 26.2. The change in risk


Date: Doc:


07.05.2014 A2539 East Anglia THREE Windfarm Appendix 15.1 Page: 166


www.anatec.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220