This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS ANALYSIS


Pursuing a broad GaN portfolio EPC:


Intent on flooding power device markets with GaN-on-silicon FETs, Alex Lidow, EPC, talks to Rebecca Pool about future market opportunities.


For a man that made his name from silicon, Alex Lidow, is now something of a GaN evangelist. On leaving International Rectifier and the world of silicon HEXFETs to launch GaN semiconductor business, EPC, in 2007, he set out to create high performance, cost-effective GaN power devices to replace incumbent silicon transistors.


Seven years on, the company has released some 25 devices – typically manufactured in Taiwan on standard CMOS lines – and industry can expect more.


“We’ve been delivering GaN transistors for nearly four and a half years and we’ve staked out this matrix of different products from 30 V all the way up to 200 V,” says Lidow. “The costs of our smaller, [lower voltage] devices are actually lower than silicon MOSFETs, though we’re not charging less as the performances are very high.”


Indeed, Lidow reckons his latest raft of enhanced mode GaN-on-silicon FETs offers half the on-resistance and double the switching speed of previous devices.


“The performance gap between silicon and the last generation of GaN was very large, but we’ve now increased this gap further; we’re very excited,” he adds. “We’ve just delivered six new devices, and we’re planning to do another forty soon.”


Always-off


In the beginning, GaN-on-silicon transistors were depletion-mode types, operating as a normally on power switch and requiring a negative voltage to switch off. But despite high performance, industry pundits wanted a chip-to-chip replacement for silicon, with always off operation. And so EPC developed its so-called enhancement-mode GaN transistor with a GaN-on-silicon structure.


As Lidow puts it: “We needed to have enhancement-mode, rather than depletion-mode devices, and now we have this, I have no doubt that GaN will take over the power transistor business, over the next decade, for 600 V applications and less.”


But this is where Lidow’s take on the future of GaN in power devices gets interesting. While many manufacturers – including EPC – push 600 V GaN-on- silicon devices through qualification, Lidow reckons the real action still lies with lower-voltage devices.


According to the EPC chief executive, 600 V devices make up some 25 percent of the overall power transistor market, while devices rated at 200 V or less pull in a hefty 75 percent of the market.


“This lower voltage market is the most performance sensitive and really cares about the switching speed,” says Lidow, adding: “Above 600 V, most applications


20 www.compoundsemiconductor.net Issue VI 2014 Copyright Compound Semiconductor


are at 100 kHz and the market becomes focused on cost.”


“So our strategy all along has been to aim at the low voltage performance market, and once we get our costs down, go after higher voltage applications,” explains Lidow.


In the past, he has forecast that the basic cost of his company’s GaN transistor should be less than a silicon MOSFET, with the same on-resistance and voltage, come 2016. But right now, he asserts his company’s lower voltage devices have already hit this target, and all products will follow by mid-2015.


“We use standard silicon foundries and produce in volumes; all we have to do is buy the epireactor which is relatively inexpensive, and because our products are self-isolating, we don’t have to package the devices,” he says. “So GaN- on-silicon can be made cheaper than silicon due to the smaller die and not needing a package. So when you look at it all, the stress on the existing silicon infrastructure is zero.”


But Lidow reckons EPC’s price gains will dwindle beyond 600 V GaN-on-silicon FETs. He asserts that at much higher blocking voltages – 900 V and higher – transistors have typically taken a vertical, rather than lateral structure, in response to higher breakdown voltages and current collapse issues. As such, device


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160