RESEARCH REVIEW Nickel enhances graphene contacts
Covering a graphene contact with a thin layer of nickel allows the performance of an ultraviolet LED built with this upper electrode to get close to that of a conventional device
GRAPHENE is yet to fulfil its potential as a great electrode for making ultraviolet LEDs. But it has recently made great strides in that direction, thanks to the efforts of a partnership between two universities in South Korea: Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology and Chonbuk National University.
One of the most attractive features of graphene is its incredibly high transparency over a vast spectral range, but when it is used as a p-contact in ultraviolet LEDs, it leads to a very high turn-on voltage. The South Korean team has now partly addressed this, showing that this voltage can plummet from 13.2 V to 7.1 V by adding a thin nickel film onto this allotrope of carbon.
[the development of] a growth technology enabling not only ultra-high transparency, but a comparable sheet resistance to ITO.”
Nickel is used twice in the fabrication of LEDs with novel contacts: first as mask (that is not removed perfectly), and again in combination with graphene, to lower sheet resistance
PMMA and deposited the result on the wafers, before warm acetone removed the acrylate.
The tremendous transparency of graphene partly stems from its thinness – it is only 2-3 nm thick. “Graphene is grown on a metal foil, with compositing grains, so that it is a monolayer somewhere and could be a bilayer elsewhere,” explains corresponding author Dong-Seon Lee from Chonbuk National University. In comparison, a standard p-contact for ultraviolet LEDs, indium tin-oxide (ITO), is typically several hundred nanometres thick. Although this greater thickness hampers transparency, it aids sheet resistance, which is inversely proportional to film thickness. Graphene lags in terms of sheet resistance, but not by much, thanks to its mobility that is three orders of magnitude higher than ITO.
The researchers learnt how to enhance graphene-based ultraviolet LEDs by first studying the performance of three different blue-emitting devices: one had an ITO layer, another a graphene layer, and a third had a nickel film on top of the graphene. All three blue-emitting chips had the same heterostructure, and were formed by MOCVD growth on GaN-on- sapphire templates. To add a graphene layer, the team mixed this material with
To make graphene-only LEDs and those with the contact made from nickel and graphene, a 100 nm-thick layer of nickel was deposited onto the graphene-coated structures to act as a mesa-etching mask (see Figure). Etching with reactive ions and an inductively coupled plasma exposed the n-GaN, before the nickel mask was etched in hydrochloric acid.
Fabrication of the nickel-on-graphene LED involved deposition of a 3 nm-thick nickel layer. This device, and that with just the graphene contact, were then annealed in nitrogen at 500 °C.
The team has studied the transmittance of all three types of contact. For graphene, it exceeds 90 percent from 300 nm to 700 nm; while for ITO it is above 80 percent above 400 nm, but falls to 70 percent at 380 nm; and for nickel- on-graphene, it is about 75 percent for all wavelengths above 380 nm. Sheet resistance for the graphene sample is 1250 Ω/¨, while the addition of nickel drops this to 690 Ω/¨.In comparison, for ITO it is just 43 Ω/¨. Lee admits that this is an issue: “One of the most important things in graphene research must be
The team has scrutinised the surface of the graphene-coated LED with a scanning electron microscope and found that the wet-etching process for removing the nickel mask is not perfect – it leaves traces of the material. These nano-islands that remained cover a very small fraction of the surface but are not believed to impact the optical transmission or sheet resistance of the graphene.
Driven at 20 mA, forward voltages for the ITO, nickel-on-graphene and graphene LEDs were 3.5 V, 4.8 V and 6.2 V, respectively. According to the team, graphene leads to a higher forward voltage than ITO, due to higher sheet and contact resistances. The addition of a thin nickel layer onto the graphene leads to the diffusion of these metal atoms, which have a lower workfuntion and reduce the Schottky barrier height.
The team went on to apply its nickel-on- graphene contacts to ultraviolet LEDs emitting at 380 nm. At 20 mA, this device produced 83 percent of the output of the ITO control. This shows that for ultraviolet LEDs, when the carbon allotrope is coated with nickel, it can get close to the performance of the more traditional ITO- based design – and further optimisation should enable this structure to surge ahead.
“Our next plan is to use the metal- combined-graphene-transparent as an electrode for a diverse range of optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells, detectors and transistors,” says Lee.
J.-P. Shim et. al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 151115 (2013)
June 2013
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 61
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191