NEWS REVIEW SiC rescues the power device market
STARTING IN LATE 2011, the power electronics downturn in 2012 was quite severe, exhibiting a 20 percent decline.
Yole Développement says this in its “SiC Market 2013: Technology and Market for SiC Wafers, Devices and Power Modules” report.
Yole’s report focuses on the entire value- chain and covers all SiC applications in low, medium and high power ranges and provides all metrics up to 2020.
The market suffered from the global economic downturn combined with external factors like China controlling what happened in some selected markets (Wind turbine or Rail traction projects that have been stopped or postponed).
However, the SiC device market kept on growing with a 38 percent increase year over year. SiC technology is now commonly accepted as a reliable and pertinent alternative to the silicon world.
Most power module and power inverter manufacturers have already included it in their roadmap as an option or as a firm project. However time-to-market differs from application to application as a function of value proposals for cost, specifications, availability and so on.
Despite a quite depressed market last year, PV inverters have proven their appetite for SiC devices in 2012. They are the biggest consumer of SiC devices together with PFCs.
In 2011 and 2012 the SiC diode business was the most buoyant due to micro- inverter applications. However Yole is confident that both JFET and MOSFET will quickly catch-up and become dominant in revenue by 2016.
SiC device (bare-dies or packaged discretes) market reached about $75 million in 2012 with a sharp domination by Infineon and Cree again. However the competition is little by little grabbing market share with STMicroelectronics and Rohm closing the loop.
Yole estimates there are now more than 30 companies worldwide which have established a dedicated SiC device manufacturing capability with related
commercial and promotion activities. Virtually, all other existing silicon-based power device makers are also more or less active in the SiC market but at different stages.
2012 has seen the ramp-up of some companies, such as Rohm, MicroSemi, GeneSiC or STMicro, facing the 2 giants Cree and Infineon, prefiguring a new market shaping in the coming years.
Four new companies - Raytheon, Ascatron, IBS and Fraunhofer IISB - have decided, almost simultaneously, to launch SiC foundry services or contract manufacturing services. This business model establishment addresses the demand of future SiC fabless and design houses that may look for specific manufacturing partners. It will also probably act as a possible second source for IDMs in cases of production overshoot.
In Asia, Panasonic and Toshiba are now clearly identified as credible contenders, along with Mitsubishi Electric, now developing SiC power modules. And Fuji Electric’s new SiC line is now running within the Japanese national program.
No Chinese device maker has emerged yet, however, according to the huge investment plan in R&D, Yole’s analyst suspects new IDMs will soon enter the business.
In the US, Global Power Device and USCi have now exited stealth mode and have strongly affirmed their intentions to take market share.
Ultimately, the unexpected closing down of SemiSouth in October 2012 has created chatter about the quite stable- until-then SiC business. Several reasons have been disclosed that explain this decision (over-sized company, market too long to take-off and so on), however Yole says we can’t ignore that it discredits to some extent the Noff JFET technology. Only the future will tell…
Reshaping from discretes to modules Yole now sees the SiC industry reshaping, starting from a discrete device business and now mutating into a power module business. Originally, this was initiated by Powerex, MicroSemi, Vincotech or GeneSiC with hybrid Si/
SiC products, then other players such as Mitsubishi, GPE and more recently Rohm have reached the market with full-SiC modules.
This trend will become dominant in the coming years as integrators require power modules in most of their mid and high power systems (generally starting from >3kW).
Yole forecasts that SiC-based power module demand could exceed $100 million by 2015 and top about $800 million in 2020 depending on whether or not the auto industry will adopt SiC.
SiC enables high frequency and high temperature operation. That said, capturing these 2 added-values remains an issue as no existing set of technologies can fully answer that request now.
The path to success for SiC large implementation will need to go through new packaging solutions. Numerous bottlenecks need to be unlocked. These include chip bonding, metallic contact technique, gel filling, encapsulant and EMI.
Power device integrators generally rely on two, or even three sources to lower supply-chain risks. In SiC, it is now easy operating multi-sourcing for diodes, though not yet for transistors. MOSFET, JFET or BJT must be available from at least 2 companies with similar specifications.
June 2013
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 13
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191