search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
10 MANAGING PEOPLE AND MONEY


Top-down or bottom-up?


All businesses need good management, and one important principle that managers should follow is ‘focus on the customer’. It is obvious, therefore, that ‘Organisations that specialise exclusively or largely in tourism need business strategies centred around tourists’ (Leiper, 2004, p. 259).


Many writers seem to agree that in tourism, as in any other business, management takes place at three levels: strategic, tactical and operational. Strategic decisions are long-term, affect the whole organization and are made by senior managers. They are complex and based on uncertain information. Tactical decisions are focused on how to implement strategic decisions. They are medium-term, made by heads of business units, and affect parts of the organization. Operational decisions are concerned with short-term aims and day-to-day management. Junior managers or supervisors can make these decisions.


It appears to be the case that, despite sharing general principles, tourism and hospitality organizations structure themselves in many different ways depending on where they are, what size they are and what they offer. Some, especially for instance large hotel chains, will often adopt a traditional top-down style, with a general manager and a management team representing human resources, finance, operations, marketing, IT, legal, etc. However, many smaller businesses, like the resort described below, opt for a different solution altogether, which Briedenhann and Wickens define as ‘empowerment and progressive capacity-building of local people into management positions.’ (Richards, 2007, p. 88). A large number of companies seem to adopt this management style and many try to combine the two.


Murphy and Murphy (2004) claim that pulling ‘the various industry and community components together to form an approved and competitive community tourism product will be fundamental to the success of a destination’ (pp. 405–406). They go on to say that this process needs good management in the form of leadership. Page (2006) asserts that the majority of businesses involved ‘in the delivery and production of tourism products … operate for a profit motive, and for them to achieve this objective they need management in order to get things done.’ (p. 249)


Leiper (1995) describes how the manager of a Pacific resort changed the way it was run and the roles of the employees. He changed a resort hotel with more than 100 accommodation units into eight small hotels arranged around shared facilities (front desk, pool and restaurants) and allowed the new hotels to be


operated without GM supervision or line managers. In doing so, the owner combined two management theories. The first is that ‘breaking up big organisations in small teams can enhance productivity and quality’ (Leiper, 1995, p. 272). The second states that ‘empowering workers, giving them the right to make decisions on matters which might otherwise require managerial authority, can enhance quality and encourage commitment from employees’ (ibid.).


In recent years, many writers have claimed that decentralizing management has a very positive effect on the success of a business, but not all evidence supports that belief. For example, Leiper’s 1995 study found that the resort experienced considerable managerial difficulty. This was partly caused by managers who could not adapt to a new role which required them to coach rather than manage. Also, workers found it difficult to deal with the new responsibilities. Much of the data in that study suggests that the experience was typical and confirms the suspicion that empowerment is a feature that needs strict management. At the time of writing, the hotel seems to have gone back to its previous centralized management style.


Buhalis and Costa (2005) talk about tourism initiatives that show three characteristics: ‘first, a shift away from centralized, process-oriented bureaucracies to more decentralized, performance-driven management structures; secondly, a shift away from fragmented, standardized operating systems to more … integrated forms of working where there is greater employee involvement and empowerment; thirdly, a change in the role of managers’ (p. 87).


However, as Evans, Campbell and Stonehouse (2003) assert, in ‘all industries … some organizations are more successful than others. This is as true for … travel and tourism as for any other industry. The best performers … possess something special that weaker competitors do not have and this enables them to outperform their rivals.’ (p. 48) After all, even very large companies start small, as can be seen in the case of the Hilton brand. Its development has been astonishing, from an insignificant one-hotel operation in 1919 to a gigantic global brand almost a century later.


81


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136