search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Report A


Report A – Survey of perceptions of clinical trials by ethnic and non-ethnic minority patients Introduction


There has been much debate about the level of participation by ethnic minorities in clinical trials.


It is important that ethnic minorities are adequately represented in clinical trials, as otherwise the result may not provide a true picture of the effectiveness and safety of the drug across the whole population.


This report will describe a survey undertaken to examine the differences in perception of clinical trials between individuals from ethnic minorities and those from non-ethnic minorities. Recommendations will be made on how recruitment of volunteers among ethnic minorities can be improved.


Method


A written questionnaire was designed to measure how ethnic minorities perceived the safety and likely societal benefits from clinical trials compared with their non-ethnic counterparts. Six hundred questionnaires were sent to a random sample of patients selected from each of the two subject groups. Two hundred and fifty were returned. In addition, twenty-five patients from ethnic minorities were interviewed in GP surgeries. Over 65% of the sample were women.


Findings


Firstly, a minority (30%) of ethnic respondents stated that they were unlikely to agree to take part in a clinical trial if asked. In addition, the majority (60%) said they were likely to agree and a small proportion (10%) had no opinion. The results from the non-ethnic sample were similar. Finally, a significant majority (70%) indicated that they were likely to participate, while a minority (30%) of non-ethnic respondents felt it was unlikely they would want to be involved.


The survey also showed that in relation to understanding the need for clinical trials, the results were broadly similar. Firstly, an overwhelming majority of ethnic minority respondents (80%) felt that clinical trials were necessary for the development of new drugs. This compared with (70%) of non-ethnic respondents. Secondly, a significant minority (20%) of both ethnic and non-ethnic respondents felt that clinical trials were not necessary. Finally, a very small minority (10%) of non-ethnic respondents had no opinion.


Ethnicity was mixed, with a larger proportion of patients of Asian origin (India 22% and Pakistan 31%) than patients of black origin (28%). There were also considerable differences in the level of understanding of English and literacy, as indicated by analyzing who completed the questionnaire.


Discussion


It is clear from this research that there are many similarities in the perceptions of ethnic minorities and non-ethnic minorities regarding clinical trials. However, there are also some major differences. The most significant was whether respondents believed new drugs were less likely to benefit members of ethnic minorities. 80% of ethnic minorities agreed, compared to 20% who did not. The return rate was exceptionally high, at over 40%, which can give us reasonable confidence in the validity of our results.


Conclusion


In conclusion, it is clear that while there are significant differences in perception of clinical trials between individuals from ethnic minorities and non-ethnic respondents, these do not appear to influence willingness to take part in trials. Ethnic minority patients were more aware of the need for clinical trials, but doubted that the new drugs would benefit their community equally. It is important that this perception is challenged and evidence put forward that this is not the case. A considerable number of those interviewed were unable to read English and would therefore require translators. Unless these recommendations are put into practice in the near future, ethnic minorities will continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials. However, there is a good chance that if implemented, the suggested changes will produce a favourable result.


English for Medicine – Copyright © 2010 Garnet Publishing Ltd 259


Resource 12D


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265