search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Summary financial performance


In 2016/17, there was a significant change in the funding of provider Trusts. NHS Improvement now agrees financial control totals and clinical performance trajectories with Trusts, with Sustainability and Transformation Funding (STF) being dependent on achieving the financial targets as a primary requirement, and the clinical targets as a secondary means of allocating STF. The changes also saw the threat of fines for failure to meet certain clinical targets removed. This new form of financial incentivisation will continue for 2017/18 and 2018/19.


We earned £12.4m in STF, receiving the maximum payment available each quarter and £2.1m for exceeding our financial control total for the year. This was an excellent result for the Trust, showing us consistently hitting our financial and clinical performance throughout the year.


For the year overall, income exceeded expenditure and we reported a £4.7m surplus, compared with a planned surplus of £6.4m. However, after excluding one-off transactions not related to day-to-day operations, the reportable surplus against our financial control total was £6.9m, £0.5m in excess of plan.


We treated more patients than anticipated, meaning that clinical income was £2.8m higher than expected. Despite a significant growth in urgent and emergency activity, improved clinical productivity meant we were able to largely protect the delivery of our elective programme.


Pay costs for the year were £0.7m higher than planned. Demand for beds was high all year, with an increasing number being occupied by medically fit patients waiting for discharge. Due to this and national recruitment problems in some professions, we had to employ more agency staff than usual, who cost significantly more than comparable permanent staff.


13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36