search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Range and conservation updates for the Critically Endangered blue-eyed black lemur Eulemur flavifrons and the Vulnerable black lemur Eulemur macaco J EN C. TINSMAN,CAITLIN L. ESCHMANN,J .S EDE R A S OLOFONDRANOHATRA


J OCE L Y N ROMEL I U S RAL A I NI R I N A,MARC HOL DE RIE D and GRÁI NNE MCCAB E


Abstract The Critically Endangered blue-eyed black lemur Eulemur flavifrons of north-western Madagascar is one of the most threatened primates. The majority of research and conservation efforts for the species have been restricted to the Sahamalaza Peninsula but there are unstudied and unprotected populations farther inland. The dearth of information regarding the transition between E. flavifrons and its parapatric sister species, the Vulnerable black lemur Eulemur macaco, and the possibility of a hybrid population complicates conservation planning for both species. We surveyed 29 forest fragments across both species’ ranges to investigate the boundary between the taxa, whether hybrids persist, and the threats to lemurs in the region. We found E. flavifrons in six fragments and E. macaco in 17. We never observed E. flavifrons and E. macaco in thesamelocation and we found no conclusive evidence of hybrids. Three fragments in which E. flavifrons was present were north of the Andranomalaza River, which had previously been con- sidered the barrier between the two species. Based on these observations and a literature review, we provide updated ranges, increasing the extent of occurrence (EOO) of E. flavifrons by 28.7% and reducing the EOO of E. macaco by 44.5%. We also evaluate the capacity of protected areas to conserve these lemurs. We recommend additional surveys and the implementation of an education programme in this region to help conserve both species.


Keywords Black lemur, blue-eyed black lemur, geographical range, Manongarivo Special Reserve, Sahamalaza–Iles Radama National Park, species distribution


JEN C. TINSMAN*‡ (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-4573)


Columbia University, 116th St and Broadway, New York, New York 10027, USA. E-mail jen.tinsman@gmail.com


CAITLIN L. ESCHMANN†‡ (Corresponding author) andMARC HOLDERIED School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK E-mail caitlin.eschmann@gmail.com


J. SEDERA SOLOFONDRANOHATRA and JOCELYN ROMELIUS RALAINIRINA University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar


GRÁINNE MCCABE Bristol Zoological Society, Bristol, UK


*Also at: New York Consortium on Evolutionary Primatology, New York, USA †Also at: Bristol Zoological Society, College Road, Clifton, Bristol, UK ‡These authors contributed equally to this work.


Received 13 November 2017. Revision requested 8 February 2018. Accepted 13 June 2018. First published online 5 August 2019.


Supplementary material for this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318000868


Introduction M


adagascar, a biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al., 2000), is home to .100 endemic species of lemurs, ac-


counting for .20% of global primate diversity; however, 94% of lemur species are threatened by hunting and defor- estation (Schwitzer et al., 2014). One of the species most af- fected is the Critically Endangered blue-eyed black lemur Eulemur flavifrons, which is subject to poaching and habitat loss as a result of slash-and-burn rice cultivation (tavy), log- ging and livestock rearing (Andrianjakarivelo, 2004; Seiler et al., 2010; Andriaholinirina et al., 2014a). The population of the blue-eyed black lemur declined by .80% during 1990–2014 (Andriaholinirina et al., 2014a). Estimates of E. flavifrons numbers have focused mainly


on the protected population in the Ankarafa Forest of Sahamalaza–Iles Radama National Park, where there are estimated to be 60–130 individuals/km2 (Schwitzer et al., 2006; Volampeno et al., 2010). Surveys of the isolated frag- ments where E. flavifrons occurs farther inland found much lower densities, with a mean of 24 individuals/km2 (Andrianjakarivelo, 2004). Based on these surveys there are only an estimated 2,780–6,950 individuals remaining (Schwitzer et al., 2006). A population viability analysis con- cluded that the Ankarafa population, which is the largest remaining, could be extirpated by 2026 (Volampeno et al., 2015). The vulnerability of E. flavifrons is partially attribut- able to its unique habitat; the species occurs only in the tran- sitional, subtropical forest between Madagascar’s western dry deciduous forests and the humid evergreen rainforests of the east (Schwitzer et al., 2007). The plant, amphibian, reptile and mammal communities of the Sahamalaza Peninsula include endemic species that occur nowhere else on Madagascar (Birkinshaw, 2004; Schwitzer et al., 2006; Penny et al., 2017). Although not confined to the Sahamalaza Peninsula, E.


flavifrons has one of the smallest geographical ranges of the genus Eulemur (Volampeno et al., 2010). Its estimated extent of occurrence (EOO; i.e. the smallest, continuous


Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 819–827 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318000868


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164