search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Cheetah and African wild dog in Angola 853


Moxico (Marker et al., 2010; Funston et al., 2017;Taylor etal., 2018; Fig. 1). These reports suggest that IUCN’s classification of the south-westernAngolan range for the cheetah should be changed from Possibly Extant to Extant. Our findings will support the new political willingness


in Angola to invest in wildlife conservation strategies and will help to unlock conservation funding for the cheetah, African wild dog and other carnivores. Given that the ma- jority of the distribution of these two species potentially falls outside protected areas where they are more susceptible to anthropogenic threats, we emphasize the urgency of identi- fying remnant populations in Angola and quantifying any threats to the species.


Acknowledgements We thank the Instituto Nacional da Biodiver- sidade e Áreas de Conservação for permits, José Maria Kandungo for logistic support in Bicuar National Park, Fernando Calunga and park rangers Fernando Tchacaca, Tchimbuale Cambuta, Ombili, José Manuel Tchipuapua and José Maria Alves for their assistance during fieldwork, and Bruce Bennett for data sharing in Iona National Park. PM was supported by UID/BIA/50027/2019 with funding from FCT/MCTES through national funds. FR, SK and RG were sup- ported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (PD/BD/114030/2015, PD/BD/142825/2018, IF/00564/2012). TM and MC were supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research SASSCAL project (PN 01LG1201 M). This research was conducted within the UNESCO Chair Life on Land.


Author contributions Study design: PM, RG; fieldwork: all authors; data analysis: PM, FR; writing: PM, with inputs from all authors.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.


References BEJA, P., PINTO, P.V., VERI ́SSIMO, L., BERSACOLA, E., FABIANO, E., PALMEIRIM, J.M. et al. (2019) The mammals of Angola. In Angolan Biodiversity: a Modern Synthesis (eds B.J. Huntley,V. Russo, F. Lages & N. Ferrand), pp. 357–443. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland.


DURANT, S.,MITCHELL, N., IPAVEC,A.&GROOM,R. (2015) Acinonyx jubatus.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015. dx.doi.org/ 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T219A50649567.en [accessed 7 October 2019].


FABIANO, E.C., ÁLVARES, F., KOSMAS, S., GODINHO,R. & CASTRO,I. (2017) The Conservation Status of the Endangered AfricanWild Dogs in Angola: an Historical and Contemporary Perspective. Angola Carnivore Project, Mulilo, Namibia.


FUNSTON, P., HENSCHEL, P., PETRACCA, L.S., MACLENNAN, S.D., WHITESELL, C., FABIANO,E.&CASTRO,I.(2017) The Distribution and Status of Lions and Other Large Carnivores in Luengue-Luiana and Mavinga National Parks, Angola. KAZA TFCA Secretariat, Kasane, Botswana.


GBIF (GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY)(2019) gbif. org [accessed 20 June 2019].


HUNTLEY, B.J. (2017) Wildlife at War in Angola: the Rise and Fall of an African Eden. Protea Boekhuis, Pretoria, South Africa. IUCN/SSC (2015) Review of the Regional Conservation Strategy for the Cheetah and African Wild Dogs in Southern Africa. IUCN/SSC& RangeWide Conservation Program for Cheetah and African Wild Dogs, Gland, Switzerland.


MARKER, L.L., FABIANO,E.&NGHIKEMBUA,M.(2010) A Rapid Ecological Survey in the Iona National Park, Namibe, Angola. Internal Report, Cheetah Conservation Fund, Otjiwarongo, Namibia.


OLSON, D.M., DINERSTEIN, E.,WIKRAMANAYAKE, E.D., BURGESS, N.D., POWELL, G.V.N., UNDERWOOD, E.C. et al. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience, 51, 933–938.


OVERTON, J., FERNANDES, S., ELIZALDE, D., GROOM,R. & FUNSTON, P. (2016) A Large Mammal Survey of Bicuar and Mupa National Parks, Angola. With Special Emphasis on the Presence and Status of Cheetah and African Wild Dogs. National Institute of Biodiversity and Conservation Areas/RangeWide Conservation Program for Cheetah and AfricanWild Dogs, Luanda, Angola.


PURCHASE, G.,MARKER, L.,MARNEWICK, K., KLEIN,R.&WILLIAMS, S. (2007) Regional assessment of the status, distribution and conservation needs of cheetahs in Southern Africa. Cat News, 3, 44–46.


RICH, L.N.,DAVIS, C.L., FARRIS, Z.J.,MILLER, D.A.W., TUCKER, J.M., HAMEL, S. et al. (2017) Assessing global patterns in mammalian carnivore occupancy and richness by integrating local camera trap surveys. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 918–929.


TAYLOR, P.J., NEEF, G., KEITH, M.,WEIER, S., MONADJEM,A.& PARKER, D.M. (2018) Tapping into technology and the biodiversity informatics revolution: updated terrestrial mammal list of Angola, with new records from the Okavango Basin. ZooKeys, 779, 51–88.


VERÍSSIMO, L.N. (2008) Mucusso Reserve. Larger Mammals Assessment. Preliminary, unpublished report. United States Agency International Development, Washington, DC, USA.


WOODROFFE,R. & SILLERO-ZUBIRI,C.(2012) Lycaon pictus.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN. UK.2012.RLTS.T12436A16711116.en [accessed 7 October 2019].


Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 851–853 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000966


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164