Conservation of the cao vit gibbon 777
FIG. 1 The study site and survey posts in the Trung Khanh Cao Vit Gibbon Species and Habitat Conservation Area, Viet Nam, and the Bangliang Gibbon National Nature Reserve, China.
border may overestimate total population size as individuals or groups travel across the border and are counted by both countries (Vitkalova et al., 2018), and researchers may underestimate total population size because areas adjacent to political borders are avoided because of security con- cerns. Since the rediscovery of the cao vit gibbon in 2002, several surveys and censuses have been conducted on the Vietnamese side of the border in the Trung Khanh Cao Vit Gibbon Species and Habitat Conservation Area. These surveys recorded a population with 26–28 individuals in 2002 (Geissmann et al., 2002), 37 in 2004 (Trinh Dinh, 2004), and 27–35 in 2005 (Vu et al., 2005). These surveys underestimated the species’ population size because three more groups also exist on the Chinese side, as was discov- ered in 2006 (Chan et al., 2008). To obtain an accurate estimate of the total population
size of the cao vit gibbon, two transboundary censuses were conducted, in 2007 and 2016, by the Management Board of Trung Khanh Cao Vit Gibbon Species and Habitat Conservation Area and the Administrative Bureau of Bangliang Gibbon National Nature Reserve, with the support of Fauna & Flora International (FFI) Viet Nam and China Programmes. Here, we report the results of these sur- veys, analyse population trends since the species’ rediscovery, discuss factors that limit gibbon population increase, and propose potential solutions.
Study area
We conducted surveys along the Chinese and Vietnamese international border in the Bangliang Gibbon National
Nature Reserve in Guangxi Province, China, and the Trung Khanh Cao Vit Gibbon Species and Habitat Conservation Area in Cao Bang Province, Viet Nam (Fig. 1). The study area is characterized by a typical karst limestone landscape consisting of densely packed outcrops, sharp-peaked moun- tains with steep slopes, ridges and vertical cliffs, interspersed with lowland valleys. Altitude is 400–950mand the vegeta- tion is monsoon tropical forest that has been degraded by selective logging, fuelwood collection, charcoal making, and agriculture prior to the establishment of the nature re- serves (Fan et al., 2011). On the Chinese side of the border, 113 tree species and 46 woody liana and epiphyte species were recorded in 44 20 × 20m plots, and mean canopy height was 10.5m (Fan et al., 2011). Diversity of tree and woody liana species was higher in the valleys and slopes than on the cols and ridges (Fan et al., 2011). Previous studies found cao vit gibbons consumed foods from .81 tree and liana species, with 19 species accounting for 77.8% of total feeding time (Fan et al., 2011). Fruits made up 58% of the gibbons’ diet, and leaves and buds accounted for 16.9 and 14.3%, respectively (Fan et al., 2011).Nocomparable informa- tion is available for Vietnamese cao vit gibbon groups, but we assume that habitat quality and gibbon ecology and behaviour are similar on both sides of the border.
Methods
We applied auditory techniques that were developed especially for gibbon surveys (Brockelman & Ali, 1987) and were used in this area in previous surveys (Geissmann et al., 2002, 2003; Chan et al., 2008). In 2007 we set up 18
Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 776–783 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001576
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164