This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 56


www.us-tech.com


July, 2014


Avoid Performance Concerns Caused By Counterfeit Components


By Jeffrey Paulownia


nents and integrated circuits (ICs) have invaded the supply chains for a wide range of commercial, industrial, and military electronic design projects. And while they might represent a financial advan- tage (for someone), such counterfeit devices typi- cally represent a compromise in performance and reliability compared to the genuine components and ICs from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Counterfeit electronic devices do not need to comply with performance and safety specifica- tions. Because they are counterfeit, they are not tested or approved to any standards. Counterfeit electronic components can represent serious finan- cial liabilities to manufacturers. Manufacturers can be held responsible for accidents that result from problems with counterfeit electronic compo- nents. Counterfeit electronic components are not always easy to identify, but by following some sim- ple guidelines, they can be spotted and avoided. Counterfeiting of electronic components has


C


grown into international business valued at bil- lions in US dollars per year. Counterfeit parts can start as new parts that are relabeled, to misrepre- sent those parts as having higher grades of per- formance. Or counterfeit parts can be old parts that are misrepresented as new parts. They might have even been components or ICs that were defec- tive and scrapped by the original manufacturer, but salvaged by a counterfeiter and recycled to be sold as new devices. Counterfeit parts need not only be expensive components, since relatively inexpensive electronic components are also victims of counterfeiting. Consumers who have purchased products with counterfeit components or ICs are often not aware of it, and many consumers view counterfeiting of electronic components as “a vic-


Light-Guided Connector Assembly


Use this new, patented system to double your productivity* when assembling circular and rectangular connectors. The Light Director™ system uses light fibers driven by super-bright LED lamps to individually illuminate target cavities in the connector being assembled. When you enter the wire code printed on unconnected wires or touch a wire terminated at the other end, software turns on the appropriate fiber, thereby causing a bright, flashing light to project from inside the target cavity guiding you to the proper insertion point. Correct insertion is confirmed by the elimination of light from that location, whereas insertion into an incorrect cavity leaves the flashing light visible.


 


® Model M3U PC-based cable test system. Electrical test after build possible.





 Pinning. Probed guided assembly also available.


 and voice commands.


 your mating connector and we will mount and program it at no charge.


www.cableeye.com/LightDirector Tel: (800) 776-0414


 unconnected wire with probe or finger.


*Field testing has shown a doubling of assembly speed while practically eliminating errors.


 flash. Computer also reads pin number in natural voice.


  insertion.


CAMI Research Inc. 


CAMI ®


ounterfeit electronic components have become more than a minor concern for users of electronic products. Counterfeit compo-


timless crime,” since the counterfeit parts often provide satisfactory performance and remain undetected in many applications. Many applications for electronic products can-


not afford the decreased performance and reliability represented by a counterfeit component or ICs, how- ever. For applications in medical electronic systems, for example, an under-performing counterfeit elec-


terfeit components and ICs, to the extent that the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is now exploring possi- ble solutions to simplify the identification of coun- terfeit electronic devices in military and Department of Defense (DoD) applications. DARPA (www.DARPA.mil), for example, has established its Supply Chain Hardware Integrity for Electronics Defense (SHIELD) program to com- bat counterfeiting in electronics. It is seeking pro- posals for some form of identifying component or dialet, no more than 100 X 100µm in size, that would contain a full encryption engine, sensors, and other mechanisms to authenticate a compo- nent. It would be added to a component, microchip, or its package but without electrical connections to the existing device, to provide close to 100 percent assurance against counterfeiting. DARPA refers to the dialet as low in cost (less than a penny per component) but robust and reliable. Component authenticity is checked by scanning the dialet with a handheld or automated prober. Manufacturers and distributors seeking to


The SHIELD program from DARPA uses an identifying mechanism or dialet on each electronic component to greatly increase the difficulty of counterfeiting any compo- nent so treated. (Photo courtesy of DARPA, www.darpa.mil.)


tronic device can literally mean a matter of life and death. Similar serious consequences can occur from under-achieving counterfeit parts in defense elec- tronics systems, where the failure of a single part can jeopardize lives and missions.


Military Hard Hit by Fakes Military electronics applications have been


particularly hard hit by a growing influx of coun-


avoid counterfeit electronic components can sidestep problems through improved inventory management, by performing proper sampling and inspection of incoming components. By acknowledging the dan- gers of using counterfeit components, and establish- ing an anti-counterfeiting policy, a manufacturer or distributor can help fight against counterfeiting. Other methods of combating counterfeit electronic devices include the use of improved quality-control methods, improved communications in the supply chain, the use of registered trademarks and copy- rights, and by joining trade associations for support against counterfeiting. Use of anti-counterfeiting technologies can also help, such as embedding trade- marks in electronic devices, avoiding the use of


Continued on next page














 





 


 








Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96