search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
State and Trends


multiple factors (Goldammer et al. 2004), these should be considered as an important pressure operating on soils in the years to come.


Urbanization and industrialization are increasing landfill- led land pollution. Although landfills are often designed to contain contaminants, using a bottom liner and a leachate collection system, leaks often occur and contaminants can reach surface and underground water bodies. Industries produce a variety of wastes hazardous to people and the environment including heavy metals (mercury, zinc and lead), and pesticides, for example, aldrin and dieldrin. The sources of these materials include industry, farmlands, commerce, hospitals, urban settlements and nuclear installations.


Social impacts


Nearly 12 per cent of the population lives in degraded areas of Asia and the Pacific (UNDP 2013), and this proportion may increase in years to come (Foresight: Migration and Global Environmental Change 2011) with significant social impacts. Direct impacts of large-scale land-use changes include displacement of indigenous people, loss of biodiversity and a reduction in important forest products. Land degradation has had severe impacts on human development in the region (Ahrends et al. 2015). Land conversion has often led to permanent deforestation, a decline in soil fertility and accelerated erosion (Van Vliet et al. 2012), and imperils associated livelihoods (Lindenmayer et al. 2012). Intensive land-resource use is resulting in several socio-physical impacts in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. The link between environmental degradation and migration is widely acknowledged and land degradation is an important factor especially in short-term migration (Shah 2005). Land- degradation induced migration is projected to increase in Asia in the years to come (ADB 2012; Foresight: Migration and Global Environmental Change 2011). Large-scale land acquisition has also been emerging as an important driver of human migration and economic marginalization (Siciliano 2012).


Ecosystem services in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal generate economic benefits of USD16 million per year, equivalent to USD982 per household (Sharma et al. 2015). Sound policy and institutional mechanisms exist to empower local communities to preserve these services and to allow them to benefit from doing so, but they are rarely implemented.


Biodiversity and ecosystem impacts


It is important to recognize the links between land-use change and degradation and its impact on associated biodiversity and ecosystem services. Land-use and related pressures have caused severe damage to local species richness in Asia and the Pacific (Newbold et al. 2015). Rangelands of Northeast Asia provide valuable ecological services and support the livelihoods of local herders on the Qinghai- Tibetan Plateau (Harris 2010), but they are being degraded by overgrazing, policy changes and climate change (Xiong et al. 2008). According to Visconti et al. (2015) several species on peninsular Malaysia and insular Southeast Asia are at high risk of extinction by 2050 as a result of projected impacts of land-use changes such as conversion to forest plantations and natural forest logging.


Desertification


Of the 2 billion hectares of drylands in Asia, more than half are affected by desertification. The increasing dust storms are attributed to wind-related desertification processes, resulting from human impacts in arid, semiarid and sub- humid regions of northern China (Wang et al. 2013). The Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) project revealed persistently declining land productivity throughout 1981–2003 for 24 per cent of global land, mainly south of the equator, in Southeast Asia and south China, and north- central Australia (Bai et al. 2008). Countries in the Asia and the Pacific region rank among the highest globally, with the most affected being China (457 million hectares), followed by India (177 million hectares), Indonesia (86 million


67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227