search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Megatrends, Emerging Issues and Outlooks


economy and environment. Figure


4.1.1 shows that


business as usual (BAU) scenarios are considered negative for both the economy and environment in two cases, and in one case is positive for the economy but negative for the environment. In all cases, scenarios assess progressively stronger hypothetical interventions which improve both the economy and the environment. In other words, these scenarios suggest that strengthening environmental well- being will also strengthen economic well-being.


For example, GEO-2 identified two distinctive scenarios emerging from its analysis of trends: time is running out, and continued success. While the report recognized emerging environmental policy initiatives, these were found to be insufficient to arrest unhealthy trends in the areas of water, land degradation, forest destruction, loss of biodiversity and urban air pollution.


GEO-3 modelled four scenarios for 2002–2032 using quantitative work and qualitative narratives. Global and sub-regional implications for demographics, economy, atmosphere, human development, science and technology, governance, culture, environment, and so on, were presented. The implications were different for each sub-region. GEO-4 continued to use the scenarios introduced by GEO-3.


GEO-5 approached the scenarios with more qualitative discussion by reviewing the relevant published literature on drivers such as population and income, consumption, atmosphere, land, water and biodiversity. It emphasized enabling conditions such as shifting mind-sets, rules and incentives, and adaptive governance.


Climate change outlooks


The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) adopted several socio- economic scenarios. The A1 scenario is market-oriented and countries experience relatively fast economic growth, while the A2 scenario is characterized by regionally oriented economies that preserve local identities and experience the lowest per-person growth of the four scenarios. The B1


scenario is characterized by convergent and service-oriented economies while the B2 scenario utilizes local solutions with rapid technology development. These scenarios project rapid economic and population growth.


The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report uses representative concentration pathways (RCPs) to make projections and describes four different pathways of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations, air pollutant emissions and land use. The RCPs include a stringent mitigation scenario (RCP2.6), two intermediate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP6.0) and one scenario with very high greenhouse gas emissions (RCP8.5). Scenario RCP2.6 aims to achieve the global target of keeping global temperature rise to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. All scenarios agree on a strong link between cumulative carbon dioxide emissions and global temperature rise and several scenarios agree with high confidence that global surface temperatures are likely to exceed a 1.5°C rise by the end of the century relative to 1850–1900 (IPCC 2014a).


Resource-use outlooks


A report by UNEP and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (UNEP and CSIRO 2011) on resource efficiency concluded that a new industrial revolution is required, in which human needs are met with only about 20 per cent of the per person resource use of current systems. The UN World Water Assessment Programme developed five long-range global water scenarios where water stress appeared to be lowest in the global-consciousness scenario and highest in the conventional world-gone-sour scenario.


According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) report, Asia Pacific Forests and Forestry to 2020, forests will be negatively affected under a high- economic-growth-and-recovery scenario while net positive growth in the sector is possible in the social-and-ecological- stability scenario, mainly because of green economy measures and the UN’s deforestation and forest degradation reduction programmes (REDD and REDD+). Several developed countries in the region have taken significant


149


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227