search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TRANSCRIPTS


The evidence lies in the fact that very few, if any, successful demonstrations have taken place under controlled conditions to eliminate the possibility of fraud or sleight of hand… a quick hand movement used in magic tricks to distract the observer.


Now I’m going to set you a task which will involve


investigating some of the points I’ve raised. I want you to do some research into different types of mind over matter. You should focus on one of the three areas I’ve mentioned, and identify examples of micro-PK and macro-PK. I want you to look at some research and find out what measures were taken to eliminate bias or fraud.


Unit 11, Lesson 11.3, Exercise E≤2.22


The question is how reliable is the evidence? It’s quite clear that anecdotal evidence of PK is not sufficient to prove its existence. Research has shown that people are unreliable witnesses and very susceptible to suggestion. So, although some people claim that they have seen objects move as a result of PK, I’m afraid this just can’t be true. The evidence lies in the fact that very few, if any, successful demonstrations have taken place under controlled conditions to eliminate the possibility of fraud or sleight of hand … a quick hand movement used in magic tricks to distract the observer.


Unit 11, Lesson 11.4, Exercise E≤2.23


Extract 1 MAJED: The lecturer we listened to last week introduced a number of interesting issues. In my part of the seminar, I would like to build on what she said, and give an example of macro-PK. For my research, I looked at teletransportation … that is moving objects from one place to another without touching them. The evidence for most cases is anecdotal, as the lecturer said. But I found some experiments that were carried out by scientists under laboratory conditions. According to the Federation of American Scientists, a number of very convincing experiments were carried out in China in the early ’80s and ’90s. They involved using the mental powers of children and young adults to move an object from the inside of a container to a new location, without opening or damaging the containers, or the objects. The experimenters used different types of containers with radio micro- transmitters and high-speed photography. They eliminated the possibility of fraud with blind and double blind methods and documented the data and experiments very carefully.


Extract 2


EVIE: OK, following on from what Majed has said about trying to make experiments as objective as possible, I’d like to talk about the experimenter effect on the results of experiments in Direct Mental Interaction with Living Systems. My research is an example of micro-PK. There’s been a lot of discussion about whether the attitude of the experimenters can affect the actual responses of the participants in laboratory experiments into DMIL. Two researchers, Wiseman, who is a sceptic, and Schlitz, a believer in psi, carried out two joint experiments to find out if the experimenter’s belief in psi affected participants’ scores in remote staring experiments. In each series of experiments, they reproduced the laboratory conditions by using the same equipment and techniques ... CCTV, skin sensors, randomization and double blind procedures. The only difference was that in one experiment Wiseman did the staring, and Schlitz did the staring in the other. On both occasions, they found that Wiseman’s participants had lower scores than Schlitz’s. At first, it looked as though they had fairly clear-cut proof of the experimenter effect. But the third time they collaborated, the results were not significant enough to prove their theory. So it looks as though experimenter–participant interaction is more complex than it seems.


Extract 3


EVIE: Right. Thank you, Evie. I’m going to expand the topic by mentioning another type of mind over matter. This is another example of micro-PK. I’ve been looking at meditation and how it’s possible to influence the body with the mind. The most carefully controlled experiments that I could find go back to 1970, when Elmer and Alyce Green invited Swami Rama, an Indian master of yoga, to demonstrate how he could raise and lower the temperature in different parts of his hand, and lower his pulse until it was almost undetectable. The researchers took a lot of precautions to prevent fraud or tricks. They attached psycho-physiology equipment, including a cardiotachometer, and a thermistor to the yogi to measure his heart rate and the temperature on either side of his hand. Two of the researchers stayed in the room with the Swami, so he couldn’t cheat, while all his physical responses were being measured on the equipment in a separate room. What’s amazing is that they found that he really could control his pulse and the temperature in his hand.


133


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137