search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Extract 7


With respect to ectoplasm, it must be said that scientific experiments have not supported its existence.


Extract 8


Honorton gave a good description of this technique in the Psychological Bulletin in 1994 ...


Extract 9 And to the extent that it can be tested, they’ve concluded that it doesn’t.


Extract 10


A case in point is the out-of-body experience (OBE) ...


Extract 11 … which French briefly describes as …


Extract 12 He has no doubt that there are psychological explanations for the phenomenon.


Unit 11, Lesson 11.3, Exercise A≤2.20 mental 'powers mind over 'matter living 'systems physical 'health naked 'eye special 'apparatus distant 'healing random 'intervals sleight of 'hand


Unit 11, Lesson 11.3, Exercise B≤2.21


Part 3 I’d like to turn now to the topic of mind over matter … This is a general category for phenomena that suggest that the mind can have a direct effect on objects and living bodies. This group of phenomena includes psychokinesis or PK … which means using willpower to move or alter objects … and Direct Mental Interaction with Living Systems (D-M-I-L-S) … which includes using mental powers to improve people’s health … you know, people who believe they can control their health through meditation or even heal others at a distance.


Before we go any further, I should explain that there are two main types of PK. One is macro-PK,


132


which can be seen with the naked eye …, which means we don’t need any instruments to see it. The second is micro-PK, which can only be observed with special apparatus, usually in a laboratory.


To begin with, let’s look at a study in macro-PK.


Since the 1970s, many people have claimed to be able to bend metal spoons and other objects with their mental powers. These demonstrations have sometimes taken place in front of eyewitnesses. Others have been filmed. So the evidence has been taken directly from observers, many of whom have been convinced that various metal objects have been deformed as a result of psychokinesis.


Now, let’s move on to DMILS. First, let me give


you an example. When you’re standing in a crowd, have any of you had a strange feeling that someone’s staring at you? Or, when you’re in a queue, have you ever tried staring at the back of someone’s head until they look round? Have you done that? Interesting, isn’t it? Well, that’s called remote staring, and has actually been researched under laboratory conditions that would classify it as micro-PK. In remote staring experiments, the participant sits in a room with electrodes attached to their skin to detect any reaction when they feel someone is staring at them. Meanwhile, the experimenter stares at them on CCTV from another room for 30-second periods at random intervals. In a few studies, the results have been slightly in favour of the existence of psychic powers … just enough to promote further research.


Finally, I’d like to look very briefly at another


example of DMILS … in this case, the power of the mind to heal the body. Several alternative therapies, like reiki, are based on the theory that diseases can be cured by treating imbalances in our energy, even at a distance. Meditation is another case in point. It involves a combination of concentration and relaxation that produces an altered state of mind. There are claims that regular meditation can produce health benefits, and many people report an increased sense of well-being when they meditate. This is known as biofeedback. However, there is no conclusive scientific evidence to prove the benefits of meditation yet. Neither has it been possible, so far, to prove claims of distant healing.


The question is how reliable is the evidence? It’s


quite clear that anecdotal evidence of PK is not sufficient to prove its existence. Research has shown that people are unreliable witnesses and very susceptible to suggestion. So, although some people claim that they have seen objects move as a result of PK, I’m afraid this just can’t be true.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137