search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
through penetration testing. Te key advantage is that operators are not security experts. Tey can read regulations or standards, but those documents often mean nothing to them. With our knowledge base and experience, we know what is needed, so that operators are spending money in the right place across the entire security lifecycle.


Firesand recently launched Firesand Shield - a credential-stuffing and account fraud solution designed specifically for iGaming platforms. How does Shield differentiate itself from legacy bot detection tools, and how do you balance powerful protection with friction free user experience?


Te key difference is there is a human element in Firesand Shield, that is what makes it different from purely automated solutions.


Bot detection tools detect bots, whether they are malicious or not. We focus specifically on detecting attacks. We understand how attacks work because we have expert penetration testers, that is one of our


Firesand's product roadmap includes geolocation anomaly detection, VPN analysis, and behavioural profiling. Which new capabilities are due next?


Features like geolocation and VPN analysis are important from a regulatory perspective. We will be able to let you know if someone is not where they claim to be. If someone says they are in a regulated jurisdiction but something suggests they are not, you need to know that as a gaming operator to enforce regulations properly. Tese capabilities directly support regulatory compliance by helping operators verify player locations and detect potential circumvention of geographical restrictions.


iGaming fraud tactics continue to evolve. How is Firesand future proofing its solutions with new technologies?


We are expanding Shield significantly beyond just account protection. We want it to be a shield in front of all APIs and applications. We will


Simply, we want to be the leading cybersecurity company in iGaming. We have deep expertise in both iGaming and cybersecurity, and we are confident that we have the aptitude


and understanding to lead that space. Our focus is on continued expansion across key markets - Latin America, Asia, Africa,


Middle East, and the US, following where the regulated iGaming markets are developing.


core services. We have built Shield to detect those attacks whether they are executed by bots, automated scripts, massive botnets, or someone manually testing. We are not limited to just bots.


We focus on understanding and detecting attacks at the application layer, specifically account attacks like credential stuffing, account takeover, and identity spoofing. Tese are common in iGaming.


For user experience, the whole idea is to gain a much more accurate idea of when an attack is occurring, which means you don't need captcha’s or other friction points for end users. A login becomes a regular login. We present the operator with a risk level for that account and whether the system appears under attack.


Te operator can then decide whether to interrupt the user's flow, but it enables seamless logins unless necessary.


CHRIS BLAKE Director Firesand


detect emerging attacks like AI prompt injection attacks. For example, if you have AI analysing KYC documentation, there is a threat of prompt injection embedded in documents that could instruct the AI to approve invalid documentation.


We are building attack detection for new classes of emerging attacks while also offering more advanced ways to prevent existing attacks. Te Shield platform will add a protective layer that makes it extremely difficult for external attackers to break in by masking system behaviour, attackers cannot see the impact of their attempts, so they cannot refine their attacks.


Tis approach replicates an architectural style we've seen that made one client unhackable, not because there were no vulnerabilities, but because the architecture prevented attackers from seeing whether their attacks were working.


97


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194