Te VAIX models analyse the operator’s entire game portfolio when generating recommendations. Tis ensures players are exposed to titles most relevant to them, rather than just the most popular games. Te results clearly show that when players are guided to suitable content, engagement rises dramatically. It also reduces dependency on top-tier providers, helping operators surface a wider variety of games and drive more balanced content performance across their portfolios.
Session duration rose by 273 per cent. What does that tell you about the quality of the personalised experience?
Casino is a very visual experience. Players choose games based on what they see, but true engagement depends on delivering content they’ll actually enjoy. Tat increase in session duration tells us our AI is successfully matching players with games that fit their preferences, even those they might not consciously recognise. Longer sessions translate directly into improved retention, conversion, and wagering activity — reinforcing that effective personalisation benefits both player satisfaction and operator profitability.
With 53 per cent of players engaging with AI-powered carousels, how did behaviour differ between those who used personalisation and those who didn’t?
Te difference was significant. Te fact that more than half of players engaged with just three personalised sections, out of 12 on the app, shows how effectively those experiences resonate. Tose who interacted with AI recommendations showed higher repeat-visit frequency and stronger cross-vertical movement between casino and sportsbook, proving how data-driven experiences enhance loyalty across the ecosystem.
Which metric best reflects the business impact of the collaboration?
For me, it’s session duration. betPARX wanted to build a more engaging, dynamic user experience, and longer sessions directly demonstrate that players are spending more time enjoying content tailored to their tastes. From an operator standpoint, that translates into measurable revenue lift and lower acquisition costs, both crucial KPIs in today’s competitive iGaming market.
Were there any findings that surprised you?
Te uplift in wagering was a pleasant surprise. We expected to see improvements in engagement and retention, but the increase in wagering volumes exceeded expectations, an encouraging indicator that players feel comfortable and confident in the personalised environment. It also validated Sportradar’s “responsible by design” approach to AI, creating experiences that build trust and long-term
72
relationships rather than short-term spikes in spend.
How much control does betPARX have over the AI’s recommendations?
betPARX uses a tool called “Boost,” which allows them to override the AI when necessary, for example, to promote specific titles or campaigns. So, while the recommendations are automated, operators retain full control when they need it.
What role did operator feedback play post-launch?
Operator feedback is integral. We maintain regular meetings before and after deployment to ensure everything runs smoothly. In betPARX’s case, the feedback has been universally positive, both on the technical integration and the performance results.
How do you ensure players aren’t overwhelmed with too many recommendations?
We don’t flood players with content. Our models replace specific sections of the site with personalised carousels rather than adding extra layers. Tis keeps the experience seamless and natural, without overwhelming the user. Te focus is always on quality of engagement, relevance over volume, ensuring that personalisation enhances discovery without disrupting user flow.
How do you plan to build on the success of this partnership?
betPARX is already planning to extend personalisation to additional sections and explore new use cases for the recommendation engine. Tere’s also interest in deploying other Sportradar AI products in the near future. Tis collaboration is a strong example of how our AI stack, spanning VAIX, Boost, and ad:s marketing services, can work together to deliver a full 360° engagement journey, from acquisition to retention.
What’s the potential for replicating these results with other operators in the US?
Te opportunity is huge. Compared to Europe, the U.S. casino market is still relatively small, but operators are looking for ways to stand out. For mid-tier operators especially, personalisation can be a real differentiator. Sportradar’s collaboration with betPARX stands out as a concrete demonstration of measurable results. It’s clear evidence that players respond to relevant content, and that personalisation, when done right, delivers value for both the player and the operator. We see this as just the beginning, a blueprint for how AI-driven personalisation can accelerate the convergence of sports betting and iGaming experiences across regulated markets.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194
