This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
VENUE 063


PARIS PIERRE FRESNAY


INSTALLING THE NEW AUDIO SOLUTION AT THEATRE PIERRE FRESNAY HAS BEEN A TIMELY PROCESS. BUT IT’S A PROCESS THAT HAS STRENGTHENED THE CAPABILITIES OF THIS 415- CAPACITY VENUE, AND MEANS THE THEATRE IS READY TO TAKE ON ANY TYPE OF PERFORMANCE.


paris, france EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST/AFRICA


Theatre Pierre Fresnay was built in 1975 within the Ville d’Ermont, which is located on the outskirts of Paris. Since then, the theatre has been catering for concerts, children’s shows and theatrical performances. It underwent a renovation in 2000, however, in 2007 the decision to specify a new sound system was made and at the end of last year the redesigned audio solution from APG was installed. For the last two decades an L-Acoustics sound system has provided the theatre with sound, however, in more recent years it’s size has struggled to cater for concerts, and a rented system had to be brought in on these occasions. This method was proving inefficient, so it was decided the theatre would invest in a new system to cater for all its needs. The process of selecting, purchasing and installing the system has taken three years. This is largely due to the fact that community funding provides the finance for the project, therefore the local people had to be convinced this was a beneficial investment. Being a publically funded project, there were certain procedures, which had to be followed. The most important being, the project was put out to tender so that all audio manufacturers had the opportunity to bid for the tender.


Gerard Vie, the theatre’s Technical Director put together the extensive specification himself. Despite the fact he had never done it before, was nervous about making a mistake, and potentially risked the project being cancelled, Gerard felt this was only way he stood a chance of getting the exact equipment he wanted for the job. Being specific with the requirements when putting a project out to tender, ensures the correct bids are submitted. Gerard said: “If you just ask for a sound system, you’ll probably get a washing machine!” Gerard wanted an open specification, which he hoped would lead to bids with different possibilities, all of which would fulfil the solution. The objective criteria included good power and coverage, SPL, size, weight and the inclusion of a strong rigging system. The project specification doesn’t state any brand names, so any audio manufacturer is able to make a bid. Eight offers were made in total, three of which were from APG. Gerard looked at them all and narrowed it down to three options, each of which would carry out a demonstration for an invited panel. The three bids chosen were from APG, Adamson and Nexo. Each company was invited to demonstrate its products on the same day at the theatre. Gerard gave instructions on how the systems should be set up and it was then up to the panel made up of professionals and non-professionals (regular theatre attendees), to listen and make a decision. After much consideration, six out of seven people on the panel


www.mondodr.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168