This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
VENUE 105


VANCOUVER CHAN CENTRE


SINCE BEING BUILT IN THE LATE ‘90S, THE VISUALLY STUNNING CHAN CENTRE HAS WELCOMED A WHOLE RANGE OF PERFORMING ACTS. WITH A NEW MONITOR SYSTEM IN PLACE, AND POSSIBLY MORE AUDIO UPGRADES ON THE HORIZON, THIS VENUE IT SET TO STORM INTO THE 2020S.


vancouver, canada the americas


The Chan Centre for the Performing Arts in Vancouver, Canada opened its doors in 1997. Since then, this performance venue has gained international respect for both its stunning design and its outstanding acoustics. The venue’s sleek, cylindrical appearance provides a stark contrast to its green surroundings. The Chan Centre comprises three individual spaces: The Chan Shun Concert Hall which seats 1,200 people; the Telus Theatre which can cater for up to 275 patrons; and the Royal Bank Cinema which has an 160-capacity. The building was commissioned in the early ‘90s and a world-class design team comprising Bing Thom Architects, ARTEC Consultants of New York and Theatre Projects Consultants headed up the project. The Chan Centre is located within Vancouver’s University of British Columbia campus, so the venue is in use all the time, either by the University, the local community, or travelling performers. The venue can cater for a wide variety of performances including a full range of musical concerts, dramamic plays, student rehearsals and presentations, plus there is flexibility to stage special events. Over the years, the sound system in the Concert Hall has been working hard accommodating the needs of the performers. So, recently Head Audio Technician Jay O’Keeffe made the decision


to begin upgrading the audio equipment. Upgrading would mean prolonging the life of the audio system as well as offering the chance to improve it. The first part of the system to be replaced was the monitor system. There was quite a competition for the new system, with eight manufacturers in the running, offering a total of 17 solutions. Performance expectations and testing protocol were outlined in advance by Jay, so when it came to the day of the shootout, proceedings ran smoothly. The testing process included utilising the Smaart acoustic analysis program to perform on axis and off axis, FFT measurements of the frequency response, phase and magnitude response, as well as the sound pressure level and sensitivity of each monitor. Both self-powered and conventional monitors were included as were various driver and horn sizes. For the non-powered wedges, in order to ensure that the testing process was as un-biased as possible, Lab.gruppen PLM 10000 amps were used in all instances. Comparisons were conducted as un-processed, as well as with recommended factory presets. Each monitor was level balanced to ensure that the listening tests were only concerned with frequency and depth of field and not the audible perception of power differentials. After narrowing down the choices from 17 to three, a trial period for the three finalists took place. And once that was complete the winner was chosen. Jay explained: “With the Adamson M15 floor


www.mondodr.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168