This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
to hide ‘secret’ ingredients behind this disappearing ink to be revealed only by the ‘touch’ of a reader’s hand.


Moving away from print, two groups


of students didn’t even bother to pause on tablets or smartphones, but rocketed forward to holograms and video-enabled contact lenses.


Looking for what they called “the complete magazine experience,” one group decided that the current methods of enhancing print magazines were too limited.


“For example, a regular magazine (print


or digital) about cars could have pictures in it, but imagine getting the car you are reading about projected in front of you that you can walk around, make smaller or bigger, and view from different angles.


This idea sounds like pure sci-fi fantasy,


right? Not according to the students. Most holographic systems require a surface to project content onto, but a system called Aerial 3D produces 3D projections in mid-air without needing a surface.


The system works by focusing laser


light to produce plasma excitation from the nitrogen and oxygen in the


Aerial 3D could produce 3D projections in mid-air without needing a surface.


air. While the technology isn’t quite ready yet, it is getting closer every year.


First developed in 2006, the technology


has improved 50-fold in five years, which, according to the students, would put it on pace to produce 7.5 million dots per second in 15 years. That level of resolution would be sufficient for making holographs out of complex objects, texts, images, and movies.


How would this work? The readers


would wear a device that would consist of three parts: 1) a camera to detect which page of the print magazine the reader is on via image recognition; 2) a depth sensor like the one used in Microsoft’s Kinect system to recognise and analyse gestures by the reader to control and interact with the hologram, and 3) an aerial 3D projector for the hologram.


A second group of students wanted to


make the magazine-reading experience more visual and more immersive. Their vision did not involve images floating


51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132