search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PART 5


Improper actions or omissions by an organizing authority These might include: • a defective notice of race that failed to list a requirement that prevented a boat from competing in one or more races of an event until belatedly remedied, such as a requirement to carry non-standard safety equipment.


• A time given in the notice of race for the start time of the first race when this is subsequently brought forwards without giving adequate notice, resulting in the boat arriving too late at the event to sail the first race.


• A refusal of an entry under rule 76, if done after the start of the first race, or for some other reason believed to be ‘improper’.


Improper actions or omissions by a protest committee


Rule P4, when it applies, contemplates the possibility of redress arising from a ‘yellow flag’ penalty for breaking rule 42 when it is improper because a penalty was signalled after the race committee had switched off part of rule 42 by displaying flag R. Most other protest committee mistakes are made in the context of a hearing, where reopening under rule 66 is the first opportunity for righting wrongs, followed by an appeal. As stated above, the redress route is barred. On appeal, a decision of a protest committee can be found to be incorrect, and it can also be found to be technically legal but redressably improper, as for instance the decision to grant redress against a race committee error in the form of abandoning a number of races when only one or a few of those races was in fact affected1


. Improper actions or omissions by a race committee


It is these that most often lead to appeals. They will result in redress only if they affect a boat’s score. Examples from the cases include: • Failure to make the sound signal of an individual recall (WS 71), or the flag of a general recall (RYA 1982/7) or not making the individual recall signal until 30-40 seconds after the starting signal (RYA 1998/3), or removing flag X prematurely (RYA 2006/2), or not making a recall hail required by the sailing instructions (US 90), or making an additional sound signal in respect of any race signal (RYA 2004/7, SC 33).


• Laying a finishing line nearly in line with the last leg so that the direction of finishing is unclear (WS 82). • Relaying the starting line too far from its original position to allow a boat to reach it in time (RYA 1969/12). • Setting a course that is so ambiguous that no boat can sail the course (RYA 1993/1) • Badly locating a starting cannon so that its shot injures a competitor or damages a boat (RYA 1996/6) • Knowing that a fixed mark is out of place but not advising competitors of its new position, or replacing it with an object displaying flag M (RYA 2002/10)


• Issuing ambiguous sailing instructions (SC 73), US 103 • Changing the displayed course after the warning signal (RYA 1983/7) • Wrongly identifying a boat as OCS, as discussed under rule 29.1: or wrongly notifying her during the race that she was OCS


• Abandoning a race when there is no time limit on the race (RYA 1982/17) • Abandoning a race that cannot be shortened, before it is clear that no boat will finish in the time limit (RYA 1999/8).


• Disqualifying a boat without a hearing or scoring her DNF for leaving a course mark on the wrong side (WS 80, RYA 1989/8)


• Allowing excess cordage to stream from a mark, resulting in its being touched (RYA 1989/10) • Simultaneously displaying two different courses (RYA 2008/2)


Examples where the race committee did nothing improper • Laying a mark near the bank so that bunched boats could not pass between without colliding, when the water depth precluded the laying of a mark further away (RYA 1985/3).


• A hail during a race to a boat by the race officer that the race committee intended to protest her (RYA 1990/5). • An oral briefing by the race officer that was misinterpreted by a competitor as changing a rule (RYA 2004/1). • Failure by the race committee to discover that a rating certificate was invalid (WS 68). • Rescheduling the resail of a race to a date when the boat whose original request for redress had caused it to be abandoned could not take part (RYA 1999/9).


• Using a verified transit to judge whether boats were OCS when the pin end mast was obscured by boats (a former Q&A).


1 WS 37 190 RYA The Racing Rules Explained


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256