search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PART 5


‘However…if the other boat is beyond hailing distance, the protesting boat need not hail but she shall inform the other boat at the first reasonable opportunity;’


If a protesting boat has any doubt that her hail will have been heard, she should advise the protested boat when their paths next cross (which may be ashore). Protestees are notorious for failing to hear hails (or to see flags). While a hail at the time of the incident may not be required because of this rule, it does not change the requirement to display a protest flag at the time of the incident (if that requirement applies). Why should this be necessary? Because a protest flag is a notice to all boats of an intention to protest, and while it may not have been seen by the protestee at around the time of the incident, it may have been observed by other competitors, who may be requested to witness this if there is any dispute as to validity in the protest hearing.


‘If the hull length of the protesting boat is less than 6 metres, she need not display a red flag.’ The thinking behind this relaxation was that it was inconvenient for smaller boats to comply, but it has not stopped some classes (including single-handed dinghies) recommending the retention of the requirement for a protest flag. The difficulty of deciding that a protest is valid when there is only an unheard hail is discussed under rule 63.5, and having to display a protest flag at the time means that a competitor cannot be put under unfair after-race pressure by a parent or coach to lodge a protest, being coerced to claim untruly that a protest hail was made at the time of the incident1


.


Even when the size of boat removes the necessity to show a red flag, some competitors deliberately still display one, to enhance the prospects of a protest being found valid – if there was clearly a flag displayed at the time, it is much more likely that there was a hail, if that is contested.


‘If the incident was an error by the other boat in sailing the course, she need not hail or display a red flag but she shall inform the other boat either before that boat finishes or at the first reasonable


opportunity after the other boat finishes.’


This applies when it appears that a boat has left out a course mark, or left one on the wrong side. It gives considerable latitude to the timing of the notification. It is not clear whether a boat that could inform the other boat before the other finishes can in fact delay her notification until after the other finishes. This is important, since rule 28.2 precludes returning to correct the boat’s track once she has finished.


‘If as a result of the incident a member of either crew is in danger, or there is injury or serious damage that is obvious to the boat intending to protest, the requirements of this rule do not apply to her, but she shall attempt to inform the other boat within the time limit of rule 61.3.’


This (together with rule 60.3(a)(1)) removes the bizarre possibility of there having been a major accident, possibly even a sinking, and yet no valid protest, because no one thought to hail or flag at the time. Unlike the notification requirements of other parts of rule 61, this rule recognises that in a serious situation, it may be difficult to inform the other boat, so proof of an attempt to notify is sufficient, provided that the protest committee is satisfied that the damage or injury is obvious to the protested boat as well as to the protesting boat. As in all rules involving injury or damage, injury is bodily injury to a person and damage is limited to physical damage to a boat or her equipment2


. Damage and injury to feelings do not count, nor does harm to a finishing position. But the damage in rule 61.1(a)(4) need not be serious, and it need not be obvious to both boats, only to the boat intending to protest. I think it must be obvious at the time of the incident, since the rule’s purpose is to excuse a failure to hail and flag at the time of the incident.


There is a new sensible exception to immediate notification of a protest when a member of either crew is in danger – giving help has priority.


1 As well, or instead, there is sometimes a requirement in the sailing instructions for an intention to protest to be notified to the race committee


boat when finishing. 2 WS 110


182 RYA The Racing Rules Explained


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256