PART 5
‘When her protest will concern an incident in the racing area that she was involved in or saw…’ An ‘incident in the racing area’ will include situations when the boats are subject to the racing rules of sailing, but are not yet ‘racing’, as defined, or have completed the race. Although a boat may not be able to be penalised as a result of such a protest, a protest hearing will help find the facts for a related request for redress (and/or insurance claim)1
. If the boats that are not yet racing are near each other, a ‘Protest’ hail, and, in some cases, a red flag, will be required at the first reasonable opportunity after the incident – to wait until the preparatory signal will be too late2
.
‘…she shall hail ‘Protest’ and conspicuously display a red flag at the first reasonable opportunity for each. She shall display the flag until she is no longer racing.’ When Vindictive sees an incident between Iris and Daffodil, she is perfectly entitled to protest either or both of them3
. She must comply with protest notification requirements at the time of the incident, and ‘cannot justify her own failure to display a protest flag on the grounds that none of the other boats lodged a valid protest after displaying a protest flag4
other boat(s) at the first reasonable opportunity5 The actual word ‘Protest’ (or a derivative such as ‘protesting’ or ‘protested’) must be used6 . If this becomes an
issue at the start of a protest hearing, then the longer it has taken for that word to emerge after the incident, the more sceptical a protest committee should be. In particular, one boat pointing out to another boat that she has touched a mark, and/or suggesting that she should take a penalty, involves using words that needlessly occupy the first reasonable opportunity for uttering the word ‘Protest’. A hail places no obligation on a boat to proceed with a protest. Best advice is therefore to hail ‘Protest’ first, then think and argue next.
When a red protest flag is required to be displayed, it is understandable that it may not be broken out at the same moment as the hail is made, but it must follow very quickly. RYA 1999/1 gives useful clarification, particularly how attentive a protest committee should be over validity formalities.
Question 1
When the rules require a boat to display a protest flag in order for a protest to be valid, should the protest committee expect a competitor to have the protest flag ready to use, or is it reasonable in a larger boat to keep it below or in a locker, and fetch it when needed? If not, how many seconds does a boat have before the first reasonable opportunity may be said to have passed?
Answer 1
A protest committee should expect a competitor to have a protest flag close at hand. Where it is kept is not important, but if its location delays its display significantly, as it is likely to do if kept below, and there was some other more quickly accessible place where it could have been kept, then it will not have been displayed at the first reasonable opportunity. No particular time for displaying the protest flag can be specified. The longer the time between the incident and the display of the protest flag, the more closely the protest committee should examine the circumstances to see if the first reasonable opportunity had clearly passed7.
.’ So she must also hail ‘Protest’ at the time, if within hailing distance, otherwise notify the .
1 See the Part 2 preamble 2 RYA 1996/8. 3 Her written protest will need to identify which boat is believed to have broken which rule. 4 RYA 1981/7 and 1996/2. Even though one of the other boats may have hailed and flagged, no written protest may result, or it may be too late, or it may be found to be invalid for other reasons. A third boat wishing to ensure that the incident comes before the protest committee must
comply with all protest requirements, and if a protest from one of the boats involved is found to be valid, it will be heard jointly with hers. 5 Rule 61.1(a)(1) 6 RYA 2002/7 7 So in SC 88, the retrieval of the flag from below deck was invalidly delayed by five minutes while the crew member sent for the flag first
mopped up a water spillage. ‘Stowing the protest flag below decks where it is not readily accessible makes it unlikely that the flag can be displayed at the first reasonable opportunity.’ And SC 63 says that a keelboat with a crew of five would have to provide compelling reasons why her protest flag was not displayed within a very few seconds after an incident. Failure to display a protest flag when some member of the crew is not otherwise occupied is a failure to display it ‘at the first reasonable opportunity’ (US 67), but a boat is not required to give priority to displaying a protest flag at the cost of the crew failing to keep the boat under control or delaying a spinnaker set (US 82).
180 RYA The Racing Rules Explained
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256