SOCIAL PROTECTION IN THE CONTEXT OF HIV AND AIDS 23
dence of delayed school initiation and fewer grades completed for individuals who were malnourished as children. The authors conclude that a median preschooler in the sample could have started school 7 months earlier, com- pleted 0.7 additional grades, and grown 4.6 centimeters taller if she had attained the median height in a developed country (Alderman, Hoddinott, and Kinsey 2003, as cited in Behrman, Alderman, and Hoddinott 2004, 373). Behrman et al. (2003) find that Guatemalan children ages six through twenty- four months receiving a nutritional supplement experienced a significantly higher probability of attending school and of passing first grade (Behrman et al. 2003, as cited in Behrman, Alderman, and Hoddinott 2004, 373). Additional evidence comes from a study of 79 countries with data on edu-
cation and stunting, which found that every 10 percent increase in stunting was associated with a reduction of 7.9 percent in the proportion of children reaching the final grade of primary school. A similar study including 64 coun- tries found that every 10 percent increase in the prevalence of poverty reduced by 6.4 percent the likelihood that children would enter the final grade of primary school (Grantham-McGregor et al. 2007, 63). A study in the Philippines found that an increase of 1 standard deviation in the stature of malnourished children would increase the schooling they completed by nearly 18 months and reduce their probability of repeating first grade by around 9 percent (Glewwe, Jacoby, and King 2001). Beyond delayed school entry and reduced completion, malnourished chil-
dren often experience a reduced capacity to learn. Stunted children (in Bra- zil, China, India, Jamaica, Malaysia, Nepal, the Philippines, Turkey, and Viet- nam) and boys in Guatemala have been found to be more likely than healthy children to have lower achievement levels and poorer grades. Stunting was also associated with lower scores on cognitive tests in Ecua-
dor, Guatemala, and the Philippines (Pollitt et al. 1995; Martorell 1995, 1999, cited in Berman, Alderman, and Hoddinott 2004, 368; Grantham-McGregor et al. 2007). Stunted children were more likely to have lower achievement scores and poorer cognitive ability in Chile, Ethiopia, Guatemala, India, Indo- nesia, Kenya, Peru, and Vietnam. Stunting at twenty-four months was associ- ated with lower cognition at age nine in Peru and with lower IQ at eight and eleven years of age in the Philippines (Grantham-McGregor et al. 2007, 63). In Guatemala, children exposed to a high-energy, high-protein nutritional supplement performed better on tests of knowledge, reading and vocabulary, numeracy, and information processing (Pollitt et al. 1995, 1116S). Furthermore, according to studies from Barbados (Galler et al. 1983; Galler 1984), Guatemala (Pollitt, Gorman, and Metallinos-Katasaras 1991), and Jamaica (Richardson, Birch, and Ragbeer 1975), individuals who were severely mal- nourished as young children were less well liked by their peers and were unhappier than classmates who had been well nourished as children. Previ-
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237