search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
broadest payments functionality’, but there were a few gaps, such as disputes management, that it would seek to fill. On each occasion, the decision would be to partner or build. ACI has also traditionally used local partners for distribution. S1 Corporation was a long-standing player in the branch systems and e-banking arena, with solutions in the latter for retail and corporate banking. It had also been fairly acquisitive and moved into payments with the purchase of Mosaic Software, in November 2004. This company brought its switch platform, Postilion, as well as a retail internet banking offering. The company claimed more than 325 deployments for its payment solutions across 300 banks, card issuers, merchant acquirers, retailers, and ATM deployers in more than 50 countries. Together, these customers processed over seven billion transactions annually, originating from more than 100,000 ATMs and 500,000 POS terminals. It claimed ten of the world’s top 15 banks as customers. One stated philosophy for payments was ‘any payment token, any transaction, any delivery channel’. Postilion delivered a multi-channel platform for consumer-


generated payments with support for EMV, contactless, prepaid, and gift cards. Postilion offers PCI DSS certified and PA-DSS compliant solutions. S1 also had channel banking solutions (its traditional area, across business, consumer,


Overall product strategy


Phase one of ACI’s strategy was to select one application per area and then set about making sure that these were tightly integrated. This means being able to offer combinations of packages, off-the-self, such as MTS with PRM, with consultancy to back this up. From a geographical perspective, there were 16 markets of focus in Q4 2010 but there was also the flexibility to target others if there was heightened activity (Turkey was cited as one example). Longer term, ACI was planning to break down its products into services and rationalise these. There were common pieces of functionality across the different products. The vendor identified 15 services, which it described as ‘the 15 key things needed to deliver a payment system’. There were then sub- pieces within the 15. The 15 comprised On-board, Interact, Direct, Track (with these four in the category of ‘Initiate’), Transact, Complete, Account, Govern (‘Manage’), Detect, Assess, Resolve (‘Secure’), Enable, Analyze, Ensure, Integrate (Operate). Mapping the products to these, Enterprise Banker and Commerce Gateway (for linking existing payment infrastructures with internet payments) were Initiate offerings, Base24-eps, MTS, Retail Commerce Server, Token Management and acquirer, issuer and interchange systems were Manage offerings, PRM and ACM were Secure, and Asset, Communication Services and Payment Service Management solutions were Operate solutions. An example of the sub-sets were those for Complete, which comprised Settle, Reconcile, Exception Handling, Repair and Manage Disputes.


36


corporate, mobile and trade finance) plus others for lending (consumer, business and mortgages). For branch banking, it had teller, call centre and sales and service offerings. Traditionally, the company had been divided into two divisions, comprising Postilion and Enterprise, with the latter targetting large financial institutions. The company’s largest customer, for a range of services including hosting, had been State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and its subsidiary, State Farm Bank, but this was due to end in 2011 (it contributed 16 per cent of S1’s revenue in 2009). S1 was seeking to head to a full Payments Services Hub with its platform, on a phased basis starting with an enhanced portal, then additional SOA services and enhanced integration. It was also looking to improve the limits functionality and to incorporate upcoming market requirements such as POS P2P encryption and support for new tokens and devices. Clearly, the merger with ACI brought these plans to a halt, as the S1 offerings came to join the mix of its new parent’s, high value and low value payment engines. In March 2017, ACI Worldwide and Payment21 teamed


up to offer anti-money laundering (AML) compliant Bitcoin payments. ACI will provide connectivity to more than 350 card acquirers and alternative payment methods via an integrated API.


Some areas had been prioritised for the move to services,


such as tracking for wholesale payments, either for a bank’s own purposes or for that bank to provide to its corporate customers. Areas of settlement and reconciliation were cited as likely to be other priorities. Phase two was just under way during 2012 and ACI expected to deliver components in the next year or two.


ACI has subsequently positioned Distra’s UPP (now


known as UP) as a wrapper solution. ‘UP is essentially a set of technologies and frameworks that provides purpose-built functionality to enable and orchestrate payments processing across


channels, currencies and networks,’ said Paul


Thomalla, MD and SVP for the EMEA region at ACI, in April 2013. Key attractive features of this offering were the speed of development and cost savings, he stated. ‘UP is the fulfilment of our vision that we’ve been working on for five years now.’ At this stage, discussions wereunderway with some potential takers in the UK (these were understood to be the existing customers of Distra). UP now sits as a wrapper around multiple legacy systems. It was available with MTS by April 2013, and later in the year was to be extended to Base24-eps. ‘Eventually, all our products will be UP enabled,’ said Thomalla.


The original UP/UPP, as a payments platform in its own right, would continue to be supported for the foreseeable future at the existing customers (there were about ten, including high-profile entities such as Nationwide Building Society and Barclays Bank in the UK, and NAB in Australia). It was no longer marketed as such, said Thomalla, but ‘is still available for those that want it’.


Payment Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293