search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Uptake and customer experiences DNB


An early customer was DnB NOR (now DNB), with the first phase of a project running through 2005 centred on Clear2Pay’s BPH Customer Interaction solution. Covering the bank’s Nordic operations, this was intended to allow corporate customers to send single bulk files of payments to be executed from any Nordic branch. A second phase, scheduled to go live in the third quarter of 2006, was meant to extend this capability across the bank’s other operations, in the UK, US and Singapore. Large companies were tending to centralise their payments, said DnB NOR senior consultant, Henning Sørum. They wanted the banks to handle the distribution of the payments, rather than doing it themselves. The Clear2Pay software would be incorporated into the bank’s order management system at the customer end. At the back-end, it would be integrated with the bank’s in-house developed domestic payments systems and would handle formatting, validation and routing. Acknowledgments, exceptions reports, credit/debit advices, and statements of account would be delivered to the customer.


The choice of Clear2Pay was made in June, with the project


starting not long after this. A relatively swift implementation was one of the criteria for the selection, said Sørum. Clear2Pay did not have an exact reference site with this sort of capability, with the closest being ANZ (going back to Sienna’s Australian roots). However, DnB NOR had confidence in the Belgian supplier’s ability to deliver and BPH was felt to have more or less the required functionality. Other banks in the Nordic region had this sort of capability, said Sørum, but ‘where I believe it is different and will make us maybe a bit more attractive is that it makes no demands on the formats that customers use’. Benefits for the customers were expected to be increased STP and improved transparency.


Standard Bank


Standard Bank is an interesting taker of OPF. It went live in a pilot project in Uganda in September 2008 for corporate clients, with cut-over following in Nigeria, then Tanzania and Ghana. The bank was implementing OPF in each African country but at some stage in the future there was a plan to centralise, pulling everything back into South Africa. The roll-out was part of a new payments architecture being put in place for the bank’s non-domestic operations in Africa, aimed at providing corporates with a consistent look and feel. Clear2Pay’s involvement stemmed from a selection in the first half of 2007 which was described by Clear2Pay’s VP, strategy and marketing, Mark Hartley, as ‘very long, drawn out’ and ‘involving every contender’. At home, one part of the bank’s payments systems overhaul involved Logica (now CGI), with its version of Dovetail’s payments engine. OPF constitutes a ‘middle office’ layer, facilitating the


provision of online payment services for the receipt and processing of client instructions. These services include validation, authorisation, risk assessment and exception


114


handling for payments and collections. No one from the bank was available to comment but reasons cited for the original selection included the J2EE technology of OPF and Clear2Pay’s partnership approach. According to Hartley, the Software Development Kit within OPF was also felt to be a strength, allowing the bank to do its own enhancements around the core, particularly for country specific needs. Ultimately, the project is intended to span 17 countries. In terms of centralising, Hartley believed this might happen earlier than originally planned, starting with the initial four countries. There had been a few changes of direction; the overall project was intended to take two years. The bank is replacing Stanbic-derived systems called Business Online and CATS Africa.


Santander


Also notable was a major deal from Grupo Santander. Within a multi-year project, Santander decided to move all of its international and domestic payments across the globe to OPF. The decision was made in the second half of 2008 and followed a proof of concept project which was centred on one transaction type in one of the bank’s international operations. The full roll-out was for the replacement of a wide range of disparate systems, in part inherited from the bank’s aggressive acquisition strategy. Clear2Pay had been talking to the bank for close to two years and there was a full selection process, said Akkermans. ‘It is a very important win, it is doing what OPF was designed to do from the beginning.’ Geert Minjauw, Clear2Pay’s sales executive for Spain, said: ‘The end goal is for all of the transactions for the whole group to be on the platform’. In terms of the architecture, the phased roll-out would see


the bank’s silo payments systems gradually replaced, with OPF used to ‘wrap’ these and then a gradual switching off. The bank planned a range of projects and sub-projects, all heading towards a global architecture. In terms of priorities, Minjauw declined to go into too much detail but cited SDDs and SEPA Credit Transfers (SCTs) as areas of focus at the outset. No one from the bank was available to comment. The technology and early SEPA support were given by


Akkermans as reasons for the selection. And Clear2Pay had international reach, including a track-record in South America, which is clearly an important continent for Santander. Here, Clear2Pay software supported a number of banks via a Miami- based hub run by a company called ToDo1. One of ToDo1’s main customers, Banco Mercantil in


Venezuela, uses Clear2Pay’s EBPP solution, making it available to more than 750,000 Mercantil customers and bill service providers. ToDo1 is providing this on a SaaS model.


Crédit Agricole


Following on from Santander, Clear2Pay landed a deal with Crédit Agricole. OPF was taken by the group’s payment processing subsidiary, CEDICAM (later rebranded as Crédit Agricole Cards and Payments), for supporting credit and debit transfers on a group-wide scale. The bank went through a


Payment Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293