search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
two twists to the Kenyan tale that are not widely understood, including the success of one bank that is riding on the coat-tails of the mobile scheme. M-Pesa is also clearly not the only game in town and there are other successful initiatives around the globe. M-Pesa allows customers to buy airtime, send money to an account, pay bills,


withdraw cash via agents or via four ATM networks, and pass money on to another person. From 2.5 million bank accounts in Kenya in March 2007, there were 17 million by 2014, with more than 78,000 agents and 34,700 registered merchants. By virtue of not being a bank, M-Pesa is not allowed to do anything to encourage customers to leave money in their accounts (e.g. pay interest), but the banks have clearly seen it as a threat and have made a much bigger push than in the past to attract customers from the large ranks of the unbanked. The attractiveness of that competition has been highlighted by analysis carried out by microfinance body, CGap. This concluded that the cost of making a $50 payment by mobile was half that of using a bank. M-Kesho, a linked savings account offered by the most innovative of the Kenyan banks, was launched in 2010 by Equity Bank. 600,000 new M-Kesho bank accounts were opened in the first five months and it allowed customers to deposit and withdraw cash using M-Peso, with Equity Bank charging for withdrawals, albeit at around half the fee of withdrawals from its regular savings accounts. In fact, take-up of the account appears to have been relatively slow, for a variety of reasons. Vodafone’s efforts to take the M-Pesa model beyond Kenya are moving forwards in a number of areas. Its long promised launch in India saw a tie-up with HDFC Bank for a pilot in ten villages in Rajasthan. The need for a bank partner had been stipulated by the Indian regulators and had held up Vodafone’s attempt to join the mobile payments fray – unlike in Kenya, it by no means has the market to itself. Not long before the HDFC agreement was announced, Nokia, Union Bank of India and mobile payment specialist, Obopay (part-owned by Nokia and already established in India), tied up to launch ‘Union Bank Money’, which was similarly focused on the country’s unbanked masses but did not take off. There has subsequently been a project between Vodafone and ICICI Bank for M-Pesa in India, with completion of the roll-out across the country announced in mid-April 2014. By around this time, it looked as though the Reserve Bank of India was coming round to a relaxation of rules to help to open up the mobile payments market. Elsewhere, after a sluggish start, the scheme in Tanzania had more than six million customers by late 2010. Other schemes under way by this time were in South Africa, Afghanistan, Fiji and Qatar, with the latter focused on cross-border mobile to mobile payments. In Afghanistan, the mobile is being used for salary payments and this is bringing an important add-on benefit. For policemen, the habit of superior officers siphoning off some of the salary payments can significantly reduce the final mount, bringing it well below the amount paid by the Taliban. This is no longer feasible if the payment is made directly via the mobile. Those policemen can then also securely send the money on to their families without leaving their posts. Other mobile schemes have been inspired by M-Pesa. This was the case for Erste


Bank’s good.bee scheme in central Europe, for instance. Kicking off in Romania in 2008, it provides microfinance and mobile payment services, with flat fees per transaction and a network of local agents (it is not offered via the branch). By late 2010 there were 30,000 clients, of which around 70 per cent were 18 to 25 years old and the majority were in rural areas. It represented a new segment for the bank and was expected to break even in three years. The service was also launched in Hungary in 2013. Orange has several operational programmes in Africa, similar to M-Pesa. By the end of 2010, it was claiming one million customers on the continent, across six


Payment Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 11


market overview


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293