search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Product suite


The ‘backbone’ to Misys’ messaging and payments offerings is Misys Message Manager. With its origins in the Meridian Link messaging platform, Misys Message Manager underwent a technical refresh in 2005 to move it to J2EE. At the time, it was positioned as a potential replacement for the likes of IBM’s Merva, with subsets of the system having been tailored for SwiftNet services. The first components covered FileAct and Cash Reporting; subsequent releases were for cash management, bulk payments and funds solutions. These new components would negate the need for a bank to replace its entire message infrastructure, with the ability to reside alongside existing systems, potentially adding functionality which was not available within older messaging systems. ABSA Bank and Standard Bank both replaced the mainframe-based Merva solution with the Misys system, on a Windows cluster and Sun Unix boxes respectively. Misys Message Manager is now used by around 300 banks as a messaging infrastructure, mostly linked to Misys’ core banking systems. A few banks (ABSA is one) use it as an ‘architectural piece’ within their payments infrastructure.


The payments solution itself stems from a number of components. Misys Exceptions & Investigations was the first to be announced, at Sibos 2007. Misys explained that following an approach from Swift, it had embarked on building a solution to support the Society’s SwiftNet Exceptions & Investigations service. This was on top of Message Manager and, since this platform already supported FIN, FileAct, InterAct and ISO 20022, it was apparently simply a matter of adding four workflows and a case manager on top to support the Swift service.


It was touted as an alternative to the heavy and costly existing exceptions management systems typically used by large banks. The functionality could be extended and Misys was apparently talking to a number of banks about the solution, potentially to introduce to their own banking partners and corporate customers. From Swift’s perspective, a key enabler for the take-up of the service was felt to be compliant application software. It was expected that there would be dashboard and reference data partners within the eventual Misys solution, with tie-ups to be announced, as well as links to matching and reconciliation systems. The aim was for availability of the Misys E&I solution by the middle of 2008, in line with the overall strategy for Misys which was to provide an ‘end-to-end payment processing environment’. A prototype for this was indeed built but Swift’s E&I initiative failed to gain any momentum of note. Misys’ plan was to add new functionality to Message Manager and release a new product, to be known as Misys Payment Manager. The direction in which Misys had been developing Message Manager had apparently been driven by some of its larger users. Misys’ solutions manager at the time, Barry Kislingbury, suggested in mid-2009 that


banks had been adding their own functionality to Message Manager and looking to use it as a payments hub. This would be ‘not necessarily to glue in a payment engine, but really to orchestrate everything that needs to be done to a payment, by integrating all the different back office systems. It’s about integration and automation rather than chucking out what they have got and buying a nice big expensive engine.’ The main advantage of this approach was that it would avoid the ‘political rows’ associated with putting in a new enterprise- wide payment system, and would allow siloes at the banks to remain in place, said Kislingbury (he left to join ACI in early 2014).


Misys Payment Manager is built on top of Message Manager and the supplier’s portal platform (see below). It is described by the supplier as automating the processing of all payment types, from high-value cross-border to low- value, high volume domestic retail, on the same platform. It spans payment initiation; payment processing including validation, prioritisation, defaulting and enrichment of data, routing, calculation of fees, risk monitoring and reporting; payment delivery, with reformatting for the target execution mechanism such as Swift FIN, SEPA, Target2, Step2 and Swift bulk payments; and post-processing for matching and reconciliation, exception handling, rejection processing, audit and archive. Misys claims that Misys Payment Manager also supports Swift’s Workers’ Remittances service. The supplier says the solution can be deployed as a centralised payment processing hub replacing complex payment flows between existing core processing systems. It can also be used, it is claimed, to wrap existing legacy payment engines, to bring more agility and flexibility. A potentially complementary area is cash management. In the second half of 2008, Misys unveiled Global Cash Portal. This is a version of its trade finance portal, Trade Portal, which sits in front of its flagship trade finance system, Trade Innovation. Trade Portal allows banks to connect to corporates; an early taker was BNP Paribas working with Carrefour. A multi-bank version allows corporates to access multiple banks from a single front-end to manage domestic and international trade transactions, with KBC a pioneer here. As well as standard trade finance instruments, it is meant to support open account transactions. One connectivity option is SwiftNet, facilitated by Swift’s decision to extend its Score corporate access model to include support for trade messages. On the Global Cash Portal side, head of banking at the


time, Guy Warren (he has since departed), said adding cash management capabilities to the trade capabilities was felt to be logical and came at a time when there was ever more corporate pressure to understand cash positions. Facilities include intra- bank and inter-bank fund transfers, bulk uploads, recurring transfers, account balances, sweeping and pooling services, SCTs, a report designer and audit trail. As with Trade Portal, it can be hosted on an ASP basis by Misys. Banks can still apply their branded front-ends to the solution and there is support


Payment Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 207


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293