search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Partnerships


For a while, Unisys loomed large, with Dovetail intended to provide a key component of that company’s Open Payments Platform (OPP). Unisys effectively switched from Clear2Pay, as mentioned, having chosen this supplier in 2006 for precisely the same role. Rein Geerdes, Unisys’ business development head, payments solutions and services, said only that Unisys was still available as a system integrator for Clear2Pay projects. Dovetail’s solution was taken to form the payment hub for OPP, alongside solutions from Oracle for reporting and Business Intelligence, Sterci for Swift and Distra for high volume messaging. Unisys felt Dovetail’s single platform and architecture was superior to those of its competitors. In addition, Dovetail’s focus on being a development shop meant it complemented Unisys’ systems integration and services skills. Unisys also planned to use the Dovetail system to support a hosted European mandate service for SDDs, as an extension of its Payment Services and Solutions outsource centre in the Netherlands. This service had been announced back in December 2007, once more with Clear2Pay at the centre.


Strategy


As mentioned at the time the investment from ViewPoint was announced, Coen saw a pick-up in activity in the second half of 2010 and a general ‘maturity’ of views among buyers relating to payment services hubs. There was an understanding of what constituted such a hub, he felt. He believed there was ‘almost consensus’ that it made sense for the payment services hub to span both high- and low-value, except perhaps for domestic ACH. He also foresaw cards being brought into this, albeit perhaps with this three or four years away. Dovetail had started to do more pre-configuration of its system, along the lines of a ‘model bank’ configuration, and also felt that a key focus would be its liquidity management solution. The company was claiming signings or late stage contract negotiations at around the time of the ViewPoint announcement with three major banks in Europe, one of which was for intra-day liquidity management (believed to be RBS) and two for SEPA payments.


Dovetail was at the same stage with two banks in North America, said senior vice president of sales and marketing, Paul Morris. At least one of these resulted in a signing, from a large US domestic bank, albeit with Dovetail having been unable to release the name due to a rigid NDA component within the contract. This was claimed by Dovetail as a Fundtech replacement. In Europe, those banks that put in ‘patchwork’ solutions


for SEPA were now struggling as volumes increased and as corporates pressed for value-added services, he believed. In North America, there was no SEPA-type catalyst but the view from Dovetail was that banks were starting to move. One of those in the pipeline with Dovetail was focused on Fedwire; the other was looking at Fedwire and


152


In fact, there were no discernible tangible results from the partnership and Unisys is no longer listed as a partner by Dovetail. There are a few services partners, including Capgemini, Accenture and Polaris, but this tends to be on a case-by-case basis. The relationship with Logica provided revenue for Dovetail, particularly in the US, although there was some friction at times, as Dovetail was not always in agreement with the positioning of its system purely for ‘high-care’, low volume. Dovetail received a royalty on all deals and there was a legal obligation for Logica to identify the Dovetail engine in all LAPS High Care initiatives. although it did not always remember to do so, leading to ‘discussions’ between the two vendors. Two deals for Dovetail via Logica in late 2010/first half of 2011 were from Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and, it was believed (although neither supplier would comment), the bank for the US military, USAA Bank. Following the takeover of Logica by CGI, the partnership seemed to settle down and, in Q2 2014, there was at least one joint bid with Dovetail leading with its platform for both high- and low-value payments and with CGI bidding for the services part of the contract.


international payments.


Asia was also starting to pick up. Traditionally, there had been quite a few ‘false-starts’ here, with banks having major aspirations but not turning these into projects. ‘Now they are a bit more pragmatic about what they want to do,’ said Morris. Dovetail opened an office in Singapore in 2013, although the bulk of its work in the region at this time seemed to be for the international operations of its large US and European customers, with work still underway to break into domestic players.


Coen said in late 2012 that Dovetail would have a 30 per cent increase in revenue in the year and was continuing to recruit, thereby somewhat bucking the market trend. He expected similar growth in 2013. The supplier had experienced a couple of cut-overs around this time, at Banca Intesa SanPaolo (see below) and ING in Luxembourg, both for SEPA, and seemed to be benefiting from its delivery record. It did sign KBC Bank in Ireland in early 2013 (see below) but did not announce any new signings during the rest of the year or the first quarter of 2014. However, as well as the aforementioned US domestic win, it is known to have gained two large domestic Canadian banks as takers, following on from a win at Bank of Montreal in 2012 (see below). One of the additions was believed to be RBC, for a ‘smart middle office’ solution and with an initial cut-over in Q1 2014, linking to a range of systems, including Bess. There was thought to be a first cut-over in May 2014. The other signing was believed to be Desjardins, the largest cooperative financial group in the country, with $212 billion in assets. While no one from the supplier or bank was willing to comment once more, it was believed to be centred on an enterprise-wide payment hub, with the project only recently under way in Q2 2014. This was to primarily replace an in-house developed system.


Payment Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293