MYSTERY BUYER
WE’RE STILL WAITING...
OUR MYSTERY BUYER DEMANDS THE SUPER PROFILE WE’VE BEEN PROMISED FOR YEARS
THE MUCH-VAUNTED GLOBAL PROFILE, widely proposed by travel manage- ment companies (TMCs) and online travel agents is more myth than reality. For many years we have been prom- ised the concept of being able to make or change reservations from anywhere in the world, using the same traveller profile, whether booking in continental Europe, the UK or the US. However, the reality is way behind the picture we’re given. Our company has 200,000 employees and
around 75 per cent of those are travellers. We are a global organisation – our people travel regularly between the regions where our offices are based. In common with most of our peers, we don’t have all our eggs in one basket and have a number of TMCs worldwide. As a result, our mobile workforce is likely to be dealing with a disparate number of TMCs and global distribution systems (GDSs). If someone travels from, say, Germany to the UK and then needs to change their booking, they have to do that through the TMC in the country of departure because Germany is predominantly linked to Amadeus and the UK to Galileo, so the user sees a different profile in those countries. My expectation is that the traveller from
Germany should be able to access the much- discussed ‘super profile’ from the UK. With a global system, they should be able to access the same one everywhere. I am in travel services rather than travel buying; I am not interested just in price, but am focused on delivering a service. I am looking for greatest uniformity and greatest
BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM
The reality of making or changing reservations from anywhere in the world is way behind the picture we’re given
flexibility for my travellers. And TMCs have long been selling the idea that your profile was almost strapped on your back, so that wherever you go, your profile goes with you, and for me that leads to greatest mobility and ability to deliver service excellence. But this isn’t possible, and it’s largely down to the dominance of different GDSs in differ- ent countries or regions. That fragmentation stands in the way of travellers being able to contact any branch of any of our TMCs for access to a consistent profile. Even within one TMC that is not possible. The global, or super, profile is a great idea and should be easy to provide, because it is just a set of data fields. But each profile is stored in a different format in different GDSs, and that’s a key part of the problem. When a traveller calls a TMC’s 24-hour
service, the agent should be able to type in a name and get all details of that traveller, to find out how and where people are, within seconds. Travellers only call the 24/7 team when in serious need of help – and then find they have to wait for the agent to bring up the relevant information.
There would be an enormous advantage to a global profile, and TMCs have promoted it for years. If they have looked further into the investment required and don’t feel there is a return on it, that’s fine, but in that case, the offer should be repositioned. Perhaps it could be a joint venture between TMCs. If they could collaboratively develop or invest in this, there would be strong benefits for all stakeholders involved. And I am not convinced that NDC can solve this problem. A stronger relationship between the proposal and the reality would mitigate the fact that the gap between the initial proposal of years ago and where we are now is as wide as it ever was. It is time the dreams were brought to fruition.
ONLINE COMMENTS
Nice idea, but I think we’re further away than ever with the concerns over data privacy. Lots of companies are concerned about data going anywhere outside the borders of the country they are in, and particularly going anywhere near the US. There’s a perception that the moment data goes there, it can be accessed by the US government, who might want to track business people’s movements.
BBT MAY/JUNE 2015 43
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128