This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ACCORDING TO AMON AMON COHEN


OUR MAN ONBOARDS SOME BLUE-SKY THINKING IN HIS LATEST COLUMN


THANK YOU FOR SHARING


E


ach year it is my inestimable privilege to


contribute features


to Buying Business Travel’s corporate cards supplement, the 2015 specimen of which is published with this very issue. And each year, after researching said articles, I emerge considerably older, but also wiser on issues which have little to do with payments. This time round I gained insights on data protection fears, Euroscepticism, and barbarisms inflicted on the English language by corporate-speak. Want to hear about them?


SNOWDEN EFFECT Here’s the first. Another annual institution of this august publication is the BBT Hotlist, recognising ‘drivers of change’ in the travel industry. One name missing from this year’s list, and indeed its predecessors, was someone who has had a profound effect on corporate thinking: the renegade US intelligence analyst Edward Snowden. Whether you believe him to be a traitor or hero (or both), his revelations of US


BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM


global monitoring of data, including through private networks, have had global ramifications – known as the ‘Snowden effect’. One aspect of this is that many businesses in Europe have sought to avoid their data being stored in the US, where, justifiably or not, they fear the government could easily obtain unwarranted access to the information. I have come across stories of the Snowden effect influencing travel a few times over the last year or so: usually, it takes the form of security and senior management at European companies showing much greater interest in what happens to their booking and transaction data. Travel managers say they are receiving more enquiries from ‘upstairs’ on these matters, and some industry professionals have gone so far as to suggest corporate customers are looking to avoid US-based service providers for this reason. Initially, I learned about the Snowden effect in connection with travel management companies, global distribution systems and online booking tools.


But I mention the subject now because it came up again for corporate cards: one interviewee suggested security departments are increasingly intervening in card requests-for-proposal, especially to learn which side of the Atlantic card data is stored. The story prompts questions to which I don’t yet have confident answers. First, how widespread are data concerns? German travel managers I speak to seem especially worried about data going to the US, and I have heard of similar anxieties in Switzerland and the Nordics. In the UK, there seems less concern or even awareness. Second, is there any cause to be worried? Is the US government both wishing and able to access US-housed commercial databases to learn where European executives are travelling, plus other confidential information? Or is this an example of unfounded anti-American paranoia? And would the data really be safer in Europe? I would love some answers. If you have any, do let me know.


RISKY BUSINESS The UK has much stronger data protection than the US, thanks to being in the European Union (EU), which has just about the toughest regulations anywhere on information privacy. But as I write these words a general election looms in which the Conservatives have pledged a referendum on EU membership in the next Parliament. If that was to happen, anyone contemplating voting to


Is this is an example of unfounded anti-American


paranoia? And would the data really be safer in Europe?


quit the EU might care to study some data given to me for BBT’s corporate card supplement: an Airplus International breakdown of where its customers (all business travellers) fly. The percentage of Italians flying to European destinations outside their own country is 34 per cent, while for Germany and France it is 35 per cent and 36 per cent respectively. The UK figure is 58 per cent – an enormous slice of this country’s trade to risk losing.


NOW BOARDING... Finally, I would like to remind one company interviewed for the supplement that ‘onboard’ remains an adjective, not a verb. If anyone ventures to suggest otherwise, I will happily ‘unboard’ them from a ship in the Atlantic with the one volume of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary attached to their left foot, and the other to their right.


Amon Cohen is a specialist business travel writer, conference moderator and media trainer.


BBT MAY/JUNE 2015


37


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128