This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 64


www.us- tech.com


Capturing and Filtering Airborne Contaminants Continued from page 62


Users of extraction and filtration systems and


equipment should expect that such systems and equipment provide the health protection and high- quality workplaces expected with minimal mainte- nance efforts. Extraction and filtration systems and equipment should meet a number of require- ments, including:


particles, vapors, and gases, requiring that its fil- ters must be adaptable to the changing amounts and types of contaminating particles. For exam- ple, a large amount of coarse dust requires high- capacity filters to avoid too frequent replacement. Too low saturation conditions lead to extremely high maintenance efforts for the extraction sys- tem. On the contrary, if fine dust is largely pro- duced, coarse filters may have low capacities.


l Adaption to different workplaces.


In large production plants, attrib- utes such as “space saving,” “mobile,” or “silent” do not matter. However, such characteristics are welcome at individual and manual workstations. Filter technology should never be annoying, neither physically nor acoustically.


Capturing Hazardous Substances


Capturing contaminants from


This is a depiction of an example system that can process waste air for extraction and filtration in laser processes.


l Complete removal of all dust, smoke, vapor,


odor, and gases from a workplace environment. l


ent types of filters. Prefilters are typically used for coarse particles (such as sedimentation dust comprised of particles greater than 10 µm) to avoid premature saturation of the dust filters (for particles less than 10µm) and adsorption filters needed for finer contaminant particles.


Incremental filtration through the use of differ-


l Adaption to relevant contaminants. An effective extraction system must absorb all contaminant


l


a workplace environment is regu- lated by law in various countries. These regulations determine risk categories for specific hazardous substances, e.g. in terms of fire and explosion risks or in types of health damaging effects (carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic impact on reproduction). Demand for particle capture at the point of origin makes sense, because:


l Large quantities of pollutants can be captured. l There are relatively low capture efforts. l Good filtration opportunities are given.


Low energy consumption is possible. An appropriate contamination capture ele-


ment can deliver a substantial contribution to the quality of an extraction and filtration system. The capture rate and amount of contamination capture form the basis for subsequent high-grade filtration requirements, providing high overall efficiency and low residue in what is returned as clean air.


These two diagrams show the influence of distance to the required air flow.


al, twice the distance between the emission source and capturing element requires four times the exhaust performance in the extraction and filter system. This is particularly noteworthy in context of ever-increasing energy costs. Extraction and filtration in industrial envi-


ronments goes far beyond the principle of a simple vacuum cleaner. It is not simply a matter of remov- ing dirt but requires elimination of airborne haz- ardous substances that may lead to health prob- lems for workers. An important precondition for users of extrac-


tion and filtration equipment is knowledge about their materials and processes. Vendors of extrac- tion and filtration technology propose suitable solutions. They offer expert knowledge of legal reg- ulation as well as the physical and chemical char- acteristics of the media to be extracted and fil- tered. They can adapt a system for air purification that is fully suited to the operation conditions at a specific facility. Contact: ULT AG, Am Goepelteich 1, 02708


Loebau, Germany % +49-3585-41280 fax: +49-3585-412811 E-Mail: ult@ult.de Web: www.ult.de/en/


March, 2015


Capturing contaminants from the workplace can be effective when properly planned. In gener-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104