This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
industry  wide bandgap technologies


are on a much larger length scale than our nanocolumns. The way we like to phrase this is that our PVDNC process puts a nanostructure onto the microstructure of a patterned sapphire substrate.


We have strong IP covering our growth technology, which is based on forming nanocolumnar III-N layers by PVD. When NCSU researchers Gerald Cuomo and Mark Williams founded our company, they brought their PVD technology with them. NCSU then licensed key patents to us, and we have strengthened our IP with additional patents – together they cover several important aspects of growth technology and equipment design relating to AlN PVD.


For many years, we kept our PVDNC AlN template growth process under wraps. During that time, we learnt and refined how to use it to improve our HVPE process for growing GaN. As with MOCVD growth of LEDs, defect density falls and film uniformity increases when HVPE-grown GaN layers are formed on top of our AlN template. What’s more, with this approach we don’t have to perform a two-step buffer layer growth, making our process faster while simultaneously providing added IP protection for our HVPE GaN growth processes.


Marketing templates


When the market for sapphire substrates for LEDs took off around 2005, we decided to launch our PVD-grown AlN templates. This was our first addition to our bulk-GaN products, and it marked the beginning of our transition to a more diversified product portfolio. At the outset, LED manufacturers were very reluctant to evaluate our material. A stigma surrounded PVD growth for epitaxial growth applications, and it did not help matters that our AlN layer characteristics were markedly different from most of the MOCVD- grown AlN-on-sapphire materials being used in many of the commercial LED recipes. But persistence on our part paid off, and a handful of companies in Taiwan and the US gave them a try.


Initially, these templates did not work well for the chipmakers, because the AlN layer was too thick. So we devoted time and effort to optimizing the thickness of AlN and its growth conditions, working in partnerships with a few companies. Although each firm settled on a different optimal thickness, their preferred values were quite similar. That didn’t surprise us, but we were caught off- guard when we found that these LED makers had their best results using buffer layers that were far thinner than the ones we used in-house for our own trials. We quickly migrated to these thinner AlN buffers, and very positive reports followed from our customers.


We have subsequently mulled over possible explanations behind the benefit of employing a thinner AlN buffer. We cannot divulge many details regarding our conclusions, but we can reveal that the benefits are not limited to LEDs, and extend to any application involving MOCVD growth of a GaN buffer layer on top of the template. A great strength of the PVDNC process is its scalability. Until about two years ago, we carried out our growth on small- scale PVDNC equipment built in-house a decade ago. However, as our sales started to climb, we needed more capacity and a more robust platform, so we talked to commercial PVD tool


Kyma’s PVD growth systems


suppliers. Our conversations with them were not that helpful. None had ever built a PVD tool operating in the growth window that our process required, and after attempts at forming creative partnerships, we concluded that it would be best to go it alone. This has yielded significant success: Our homebuilt, higher- capacity tool may not be fully automated, but it has produced thousands of templates, and it has also enabled us to demonstrate growth of AlN on 12-inch silicon and on 10-inch sapphire. We are now in the process of further automating this tool, as well as actively developing plans for a larger platform.


PVD tools


As we worked hard to increase our AlN template sales, we found that many customers wanted to make these engineered substrates in-house. Often they asked us if we could supply them with PVD tools. Deciding if we would fulfil their wishes was very tricky, due to our heritage as a material company that employed proprietary growth tools and refined deposition technologies to give ourselves a competitive edge.


Could we allow all this knowledge to enter the market place? Our view was that we could. We believe that it is important for us to listen to the views of our customers and act in their interests, and we fully recognize that expansion into the equipment market is an excellent commercial opportunity for us. Process engineers that use our equipment discover that growth times are very short, thanks to a fairly fast growth process and the need for a relatively thin buffer of AlN to ensure optimal device performance.


We see PVDNC growth cycle times shrinking to below 20 minutes as we mature the equipment platform. Thanks to these short deposition times, the addition of AlN costs much less than the purchase of sapphire. Our first tool to market can be configured in many ways: 19 x 2-inch, 3 x 4-inch, or single wafer growth on substrates with diameters ranging from 6-inch to 12-inch. We are now working on a bigger tool, which we expect to support multiple 6-inch wafers and have the capacity to produce more


March 2013 www.compoundsemiconductor.net 63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143