search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
38 SUSTAINABILITY


Figure 1: Illustration demonstrating the cycle of CO2 Take biogenic carbon as an example.


Biobased raw materials, such as from plants, release ‘biogenic’ carbon emissions, which were initially sequestered (‘taken in’ by the plant via photosynthesis) from the atmosphere during the growth of that plant. When released at end-of-life, this biogenic


carbon can be reabsorbed by new plants – a cycle occurring on ‘human’ timescales. As a result, biogenic carbon emissions have no net impact on atmospheric GHG levels over the lifecycle. By contrast, fossil-derived materials release


carbon emissions that are part of a much longer lifecycle, with millions of years involved in their creation and geological storage. The fossil-derived carbon that is released therefore only adds to


100


e from biobased versus fossil-derived sources. © Deedster, Kai Hidate, crownlab and llvllagic via Canva.com


atmospheric GHG levels. To account for the benefit of sequestered


carbon contained in biobased materials, the biobased carbon content can be calculated. From this, how much CO2


was absorbed from the


atmosphere during its growth can be deduced. This is known as a biogenic removal and can


be shown on a PCF statement as a negative value in CO2


of product (such as kgCO2e/kg).


Why biogenic data matters in formulation Every cosmetic ingredient has a carbon footprint shaped by its lifecycle – from raw material extraction and processing through to the


e units (carbon dioxide equivalents) per unit


manufacture of the finished product. As the market moves in favour of a low-carbon economy, brands will need to adapt.2 Measuring cradle-to-gate PCFs at the


ingredient level provides actionable insights: which raw materials offer the greatest net carbon benefit or challenge? Which processing routes are most efficient? Where are the biggest opportunities for improvement? Are there any quick-wins? Mastering this data transforms ingredient selection from somewhat intuitive exercise into a strategic, measurable advantage. Identifying biogenic carbon within this


analysis enables more accurate comparisons between biobased products and petrochemical- based alternatives by providing lifecycle-specific insights that CO2


e reporting, without biogenic


carbon removal, does not. Many petrochemical manufacturing processes


80 60 40


are highly efficient following years of optimisation and economies of scale. This, coupled with a lack of quantitative consideration for biogenic content, may give the impression that biobased options have a carbon footprint very similar, or potentially even worse than their fossil-derived counterparts. However, when biogenic carbon removals and emissions are properly accounted for and the CO2 removal during biomass growth is acknowledged, the climate benefit of biobased materials (and the sequestered CO2


that is trapped as carbon within 20


them) becomes clear. This improves transparency and integrity of


10


Petrochemical equivalent PCF incl. biogenic removals


ECO Brij O10 MBAL PCF incl. biogenic removals


Figure 2: Product carbon footprint of ECO Brij O10 MBAL when incorporating biogenic carbon removals (peach) compared to a petrochemical equivalent (green)


PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE January 2026


PCF calculations, delivering a richer dataset and more accurate view of an ingredient’s net climate impact.


Armed with these insights, brands can balance impacts across similar ingredients, laying the groundwork for compliance and competitiveness as global standards tighten. This proactive stance


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Product Carbon Footprint (%)


57% reduction


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72