search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
R SUSTAINABILITY 33


The green evolution of the beauty industry


Barbara Olioso – The Green Chemist


I started my career in the cosmetic industry about 25 years ago, and what a journey it has been. In this article, I would like to share my personal history alongside the remarkable evolution of the beauty industry and offer insights into where we might be heading next. Having witnessed firsthand the


transformation from simple ‘natural’ claims to today’s complex sustainability matrix, I have seen an industry reinvent itself multiple times over, each iteration bringing us closer to truly responsible beauty.


The natural and paraben-free era Fresh out of university, I started working for a company that was pioneering the natural and paraben-free movement. I genuinely shared the values of using natural ingredients, but the landscape was vastly different from what we see today. The incredible ingredient selection that


formulators now take for granted simply did not exist. Our toolkit consisted mainly of vegetable oils, a handful of natural emulsifiers, and APGs (Alkyl Polyglucosides) as the go-to natural surfactants. The technology was limited, but the passion was genuine.


www.personalcaremagazine.com


At the time, ‘paraben-free’ was the ultimate


buzzword, and many brands leveraged this claim as their gateway to positioning themselves as natural brands. The consumer perception was surprisingly binary: if a product was paraben-free, the brand was automatically perceived as all-natural, even when they were using synthetic preservatives that were potentially more problematic than parabens themselves. This created a fascinating disconnect between marketing claims and formulation reality. The preservation challenge was particularly


acute during this period. While there were a few natural alternatives to parabens available, many required very specific pH ranges and showed incompatibility issues with certain emulsifiers. This limitation forced me into countless hours of testing and experimentation, searching for that holy grail of an all-natural yet microbiologically safe cosmetic product. The process was both frustrating and exhilarating, requiring patience and creativity in equal measure. Even back then, several myths circulated within the industry and among consumers. The most persistent was the belief that Vitamin E alone could serve as a natural preservative,


or that essential oils provided adequate antimicrobial protection. These misconceptions led to numerous formulation failures and, in some cases, contaminated products reaching consumers. Fortunately, more sophisticated natural


preservation solutions gradually entered the market, though they still required extensive trial and error to optimize formulations effectively. The paraben controversy inadvertently


triggered what I now recognize as the beginning of the cosmetic preservation revolution. As the industry scrambled to find alternatives, we saw the rise of other preservatives such as MI (Methylisothiazolinone) and MCI (Methylchloroisothiazolinone), followed by increased reliance on Phenoxyethanol. However, each alternative brought its


own set of challenges, with some proving to be sensitizers or incompatible with the formulations. Today, we understand that this disruption


led to a fundamental shift in preservation philosophy. The one-size-fits-all approach has been abandoned in favour of a more nuanced strategy where each application and formulation base requires careful consideration


August 2025 PERSONAL CARE


C


N


E


I


L


E


A


B


T


G


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114