search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
C


N


E


I


L


E


A


B


R BIOSURFACTANTS 101


1% APG surfactant SLES Conventional Biosurfactant 1G


Biosurfactant 'AmphiCare'


Figure 3: Foam height comparison of market standards of conventional surfactant (SLES) and market reference of sophorolipids from 1G feedstock and fully Upcycled SL A derived from 2G feedstock


transportation of crude oil. In contrast, the upcycling of bio-based waste and side streams into microbial biosurfactants prevents the release of long-sequestered carbon, offering a more sustainable alternative.


No use of palm oil Palm oil production is a leading cause of deforestation, as land is cleared to make way for palm oil plantations. This contributes significantly to climate change by reducing carbon sequestration and disrupting essential ecological processes. In contrast, upcycling bio-based waste and


by-products avoids direct land-use change, using leftover biological matter from other processes that would otherwise be discarded. These can include food waste and by-products of the bio-based economy, such as potato peels which are an abundant by-product of industrial fried potato production.


Avoids long logistic chains - The global transportation of petroleum and palm oil from production regions to surfactant manufacturing plants relies heavily on fossil fuels, leading to substantial greenhouse gas emissions. Making use of locally sourced bio-based waste and by- products, enables a considerable reduction in the need for long transportation chains.


No use of high-energy production processes - Classic surfactant production processes have significant energy needs as they typically operate at high temperatures (mostly achieved through the combustion of fossil fuels) and pressures. Our bio-based production uses a


fermentation-based production process similar to brewing beer or wine which is a clean, safe


www.personalcaremagazine.com 2G


1% SLES


AmphiCare A


1%


1% Novel AmphiStar BS


1% Novel AmphiStar BS 2


1% Novel AmphiStar BS 3


Figure 4: Maximum foam height comparison (Ross Miles) of market standards of conventional surfactant (APG and SLES) and fully Upcycled SL A derived from 2G feedstock together with three completely novel microbial biosurfactant molecules from AmphiStar’s Synbio platform all evaluated at 1% in water


TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTICS OF UPCYCLED SL A AND UPCYCLED SL L Product Name


Product form Manufacturing Appearance


Formulating pH range


Product features and attributes HLB


and mild bioprocess with much lower energy demands compared to classic surfactant production processes.


No direct land use - Palm oil-based surfactants and sugar or vegetable oil-based microbial biosurfactants rely on land and agricultural practices for production. These practices contribute to climate change by emitting nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas, through the use of nitrogen fertilizers. They also cause soil erosion, which releases from the soil. Further increasing the demand


CO2


for bio-based surfactants made from virgin bio-based feedstocks would require extensive agricultural expansion, leading to further habitat destruction, increased water consumption and greater fertilizer use—all of which exacerbate climate change. Bio-based waste and side streams do not require direct agricultural practices and their reuse helps prevent the release of greenhouse gases that would otherwise be emitted if the waste were sent to landfills or used for biofuel production. Many of the downsides of fossil and palm


oil-based surfactants can be overcome by using fully upcycled or so-called second-generation


Upcycled SL A and Upcycled SL L Liquid


Waste-and side streams, yeast fermentation Light amber colour; translucent neat, transparent 3.0-11.0 (A), 3.0-7.0 (L)


100% bio-based, fully-upcycled, biodegradable, 1,4- dixane-free, palm-and sulphate-free


13.0 (A); 11.0 (L)


feedstocks. Innovative and (economical) sustainable pretreatment methods have been developed to convert side and waste streams into pumpable and sufficiently purified feedstocks to feed into the bioprocess.. These streams are then placed into


a bioreactor—as opposed to a chemical reactor—in which efficient ‘biocatalysts’ can be introduced; yeast microbes that will convert these pretreated bio-based waste feedstocks into microbial biosurfactants. The first step, called the growth phase, generates sufficient microbial biomass to complete the reaction. This is accomplished by inoculating the feedstock in the bioreactor with microbial cells. As the microbes multiply, microbial


biomass/biocatalysts are created. This step of the process can be compared to adding yeast to dough to make it rise (yeast is added to bread to generate biogenic CO2


in the dough, which


causes the bread to rise). When the microbes have multiplied enough they start converting the rest of the bio-based waste into microbial biosurfactants. An image of one strain together with some biosurfactant crystals is shown in Figure 1. When fermentation is complete, the upcycled


August 2025 PERSONAL CARE


T


G


Foam Height


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114