search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Events


IAGA SUMMIT Macau 2018


gaming industry was considered “unseemly.” But even as many banks overcame their distaste for the industry, lenders continued to face the risk of associating with the “wrong” developer.


Most of our banking clients developed extensive “know your customer” or “KYC” protocols including extensive background checks for their gaming clients decades before KYC protocols became mandatory in the banking industry.


In new or emerging gaming markets, lenders also face the risks involved in lending in an unfamiliar regulatory and legal environment. In order to assess risk, a lender needs to understand what rights it has when a borrower defaults. Because gaming is such a highly regulated environment, in the event of a default by a borrower, the traditional lenders’ remedies of taking control of the asset and selling it to a third party may not be available. In nearly every jurisdiction, the gaming license is not transferrable, which limits the remedies available to a lender. In the United States, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code provides an alternative that permits the borrower to continue to operate under court supervision for the benefit of the lenders.


However, most other jurisdictions do not have the equivalent of Chapter 11 and offer only liquidation as a remedy for lenders. Some emerging gaming jurisdictions may have never had business insolvencies of the size and scope of a modern casino


resort, and thus, the jurisdiction may lack the precedents that would clarify a lender’s rights.


For instance, we recall needing to visit Macau when it was being developed under the current regulatory regime in order to moderate a meeting with a senior government official in the Macau SAR and the banks, which sought oral assurances that the government would respect certain limited rights of lenders in the event of a default on the loan. Te banks needed to know that if the borrower defaulted, the regulators would cooperate with the lenders to transfer the borrower’s gaming license or issue a new one that would allow the lenders to sell the asset to a new operator who could run the casino. Te law was so new that the lenders’ remedies were unclear. Once a project in a new gaming jurisdiction secures financing, subsequent projects become progressively easier because a precedent has been set. Even in those cases, however, challenges always arise as lenders and borrowers seek new and creative lending products, thus requiring the gaming finance lawyers to be able to adjust the requirements of new products to fit the regulatory framework.


Te “Tree Ds” result in a complex series of risks for a lender in a new or emerging gaming market. As a result, the first project finance loans in that market require a careful bespoke approach to craft a loan product that protects the lenders while fitting neatly with the borrower’s needs, the regulatory framework and the risks involved.


The “Three Ds” result in a


complex series of risks for a lender in a new or emerging gaming market. As a result, the first project finance


loans in that market require a careful bespoke approach to craft a loan product that protects the lenders while fitting neatly with the borrower’s needs, the


regulatory framework and the risks involved.


IAGA


The International Association of Gaming Advisors (IAGA) will hold its 37th annual International Gaming Summit May 14 - 16 at the Four Seasons Macao in Macau, China.


NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE /MARKET DATA P83


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150