search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Alan Littler is Legal Director at


Franssen Tolboom which is the only firm in the Netherlands with a multi-disciplinary team with a dedicated focus on gaming,


gambling and related sectors. As such, the team is at the forefront of developments regarding the licensed remote gambling regime.


DR ALAN LITTLER Legal Director,


Franssen Tolboom Attorneys at Law


Te Netherlands has introduced a ban on untargeted advertising, which entails that advertising for remote gambling can only take place online when conducted in line with three cumulative conditions. Under this regime, after July 1, 2025, it will no longer be possible for operators to sponsor sports teams and competitions in the traditional sense.


During IAGA's 2025 Annual Summit I'll have the honour of moderating the panel: “To Ban or Not to Ban: the Current State of Advertising Restrictions and the Potential Implications for the Rest of the Industry". Te scope of the panel will be broader than advertising for sports betting alone, as it will address questions around advertising for gambling in a broader sense. Nevertheless, sports betting advertising is an essential component of this broader issue.


Whilst it is hard to do justice to all interests and arguments within a short space, my view is that gambling advertising, including that for sports betting, should not be banned. Naturally, a prohibition is itself a form of regulation, but I would argue that sports betting advertising should not be subject to such an “all or nothing” regulatory approach. Ideally it should be subject to a set of regulatory requirements which seek to balance various legitimate interests and concerns, whilst doing so in a considered manner through clear requirements. In practice, there may well be those who will view such an approach as a compromise. Whilst an all or nothing “winner takes all” approach is ideal on the pitch this does not necessarily translate to matters of regulation.


Gambling, including gambling regulation, is frequently a topic on which many will have a strong opinion, one way or the other. Perhaps those from the British Isles would consider it to have something of a “Marmite effect". Large volumes of advertising, particularly that which is perceived as being “in your face", even if compliant with time, place and content related requirements, will often drive negative sentiment amongst the public. Tis may then combine with other touchpoints of dissatisfaction as to how gambling is regulated


and how a particular market behaves. Advertising, and sports betting advertising, then become part of a bigger equation. It may become difficult to disentangle advertising matters from a broader cacophony of anti-(remote) gambling sentiment. Is this inevitable? Can sports betting advertising be addressed in a way which makes it palatable to a larger number of people?


Te Netherlands has introduced a ban on untargeted advertising, which entails that advertising for remote gambling can only take place online when conducted in line with three cumulative conditions. Under this regime, after 1 July 2025, it will no longer be possible for operators to sponsor sports teams and competitions in the traditional sense. Operators’ logos will be banished from jerseys, venues and thus from the public sphere in general. Tis reflects a broader discussion as to what the purpose of gambling advertising is; is it to channel demand to the licensed market, away from illegal offerings, or is it to enable licence holders to compete for a bigger slice of an ever- increasing pie? Or some mix of the two? Tis is a question which each jurisdiction must answer for itself.


A full prohibition on sports betting advertising, or all gambling related advertising, will only serve to feed those who operate outside of the licensed regime and the regulatory protections which it affords. If regulatory regimes do not leave sufficient oxygen for the licensed market to operate at an acceptable level, then their objectives will shrivel in a dark corner. Regulation must balance interests, some of which will be competing, and as a part of this (sports betting) advertising must be placed within the broader context of regulatory objectives and requirements. Advertising will then be able to play its role in the achievement of these regulatory objectives.


139


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180