search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
fantasy sports industry over others, seeks to intentionally blur the lines between sports wagering and fantasy sports contests, and would be difficult to implement and effectively administer because it differs significantly from existing IGB procedures.


Te IGB opposes any legislation, like SB 1224, that could be interpreted to create a loophole allowing fantasy sports platforms or others to offer single player sports wagering contests disguised as fantasy sports. Unlike peer-to-peer fantasy contests, single-player contests constitute sports wagering and require a license. Single player contests are not the legal multi-participant contests of skill the Illinois Supreme Court recognised in Dew-Becker v. Wu, 2020 IL 124472.


Te IGB is communicating with fantasy operators about our concerns with SB 1224 and discussing the reasons why SB 2145 represents the preferred approach to fantasy sports regulation. Te IGB welcomes the opportunity to work with fantasy sports operators and all stakeholders to create a regulatory framework that protects patrons, upholds integrity, and supports a fair and competitive fantasy sports marketplace in Illinois.


Senate Bill 2399 would place limitations on betting, including limiting deposits into gambling accounts. The proposal provides that a sports wagering licensee shall not accept more than five deposits from an individual during a 24-hour period, and shall not accept deposits made by using a credit card. How important are measures such as these from an RG perspective?


In Illinois, a driving element of the IGB’s commitment to gaming safety includes a keen focus on encouraging responsible gaming and ensuring that people receive problem gambling recovery resources and support without undue barriers and stigmatisation. Our initiatives include the IGB’s voluntary Self-Exclusion Program (SEP) for problem gamblers – one of the first self-exclusion programs in the country that now has more than 15,600 enrollees. Te programme includes casino gambling and sports wagering (retail and online), and we are working to incorporate Illinois video gaming into the SEP. We also partner with and support our colleagues in the Illinois Department of Human Services’ Division of Substance Use Prevention and Recovery (SUPR), as well as Illinois


132


treatment providers and advocates, to promote responsible gambling and raise awareness around problem gambling treatment options for those in need.


Te IGB has adopted several administrative rules over the past few years to further promote responsible gaming and will continue to pursue future rulemakings in this space. Additionally, we are interested in making decisions and implementing effective responsible gaming strategies and tools that are data-driven and supported by research to achieve desired results.


Toward that end, the IGB recently established a new Responsible Gaming Research and Project Manager position that we will soon fill, and we are exploring ways to partner with experts and researchers in this field to conduct independent studies on the effectiveness of various approaches to responsible gambling and problem gambling prevention. Legislation such as SB 2399 can help start important conversations within the legislature and among industry stakeholders about responsible gaming policies and practices in Illinois. Tese issues demand our collective attention, effort, and action.


Finally, a word on the panel you will be moderating at IAGA. What will you be looking to extrapolate from your fellow speakers? How will you look to guide the conversation?


I am excited to participate in the upcoming IAGA International Gaming Summit, which provides a thoughtful and impactful forum for meaningful dialogue and engagement on pressing and complex issues. Te goal for the panel on Emerging Sports Betting Conflicts of Interest is for the panelists to share their perspectives and considerable expertise to explore a framework for identifying and addressing potential conflicts that develop in the intersection between sports and sports wagering.


I hope to encourage a conversation that will be thoughtful and helpful in our work and efforts to maintain the integrity of sports and sports wagering. As the moderator, I am also pleased that I’ll be asking the questions and not answering them but look forward to hearing and learning from the outstanding members of the panel.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180