This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
What Influenced Food Policy in 2011?


Most spectacular in 2011 was the turn of events on world wheat markets from price spike to near collapse: In the spring the media expected a second world food crisis, pos- sibly worse than 2007–08. Until July, and particularly head of the meeting of G20 agricultural ministers, speculators and index funds were being accused more than ever of causing hunger. But then wheat prices dropped, and aten- tion to speculation waned, hopefully making room for policy atention to larger, more long-term issues, such as rural finance.


—Michiel A. Keyzer, Director, Centre for World Food Studies, VU University, Amsterdam


Amid drought in the Horn of Africa, floods in South East Asia, and rain shortfalls in the Sahel, 2011 has clearly shown the devastating impact of climate-related shocks on food security. Tese crises have focused policy atention on the urgent need to build the resilience of smallholder agri- culture and poor rural people’s livelihoods. Going forward, and in light of the UN Climate Change Conference in Dur- ban, resilience is likely to remain a critical component of food security policies, initiatives, and development efforts at all levels.


—Kanayo F. Nwanze, President, International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome


Te Arab Spring posed the biggest challenge to food policy in 2011—and showed why it maters. Arab countries are squeezed on all sides by high imported food prices, spiral- ing costs of food subsidies, and the dual burdens of mal- nutrition and obesity, which will rise with population growth. Te region is also the most vulnerable to global warming, water scarcity, and export bans. Without good policy and research, feeding the Arab world will grow ever more challenging.


—John Parker, Globalization Editor, Economist, London


When food prices rose in 2008, hasty responses like ban- ning food exports helped drive 100 million people into poverty—the first increase in decades. When food prices rose again in 2011, the world avoided poor policy responses and invested instead in long-term food security. During the world’s worst drought in 60 years, this approach was validated by Kenya and Ethiopia’s ability to avoid famine, thanks in part to President Obama’s Feed the Future initia- tive and its emphasis on building resilience through agri- cultural development.


—Rajiv Shah, Administrator,


United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC


In 2011 two events were important: one was the eighth consecutive year of bumper harvest of Chinese grains at a record of 571 million tons, which surely contributes to a more stable world grain market; and the other was the G20 Agriculture Ministers Summit in Paris. A new era of inter- national cooperation on global food security is approaching and emerging countries such as Brazil, China, India, and Indonesia will play increasingly important roles.


—Jiayang Li, President, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing


Te developing world was again hit by food price and sup- ply volatility in 2011. In contrast to 2008, the demand for effective actions to advance food and nutritional security was front and center. Te Commitee on World Food Secu- rity explicitly stated that agricultural policies and pub- lic investment should prioritize nutrition and sustainable small-scale food production and increase the resilience of local and traditional food systems and biodiversity, a goal we are fully commited to implementing.


—Kathy Spahn, President and Chief Executive Officer, Helen Keller International, New York


WHAT INFLUENCED FOOD POLICY IN 2011? 11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126