This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Country Watch


A Look at the Economic, Political, and Social Events that Shape International Law Around the World


European Union Finalizes Croatia Membership Treaty


On September 14, 2011, after nearly two years of drafting and editing work, European Union (EU) member states finalized the text of an acces- sion treaty that will serve to recognize Croatia’s membership in the European Union. The 350- page agreement clarifies the legal rights and ob- ligations associated with the nation’s accession. Croatia, a small Eastern European nation with a population of 4.5 million, is now projected to be- come the EU’s 28th member on July 1, 2013.


14


The European Union is a political and economic organization formed by the cooperation of ap- proved European states; its primary purpose is to facilitate trade between members. To join the Union, prospective member states must demon- strate stability in a number of categories, gener- ally regarded as the Copenhagen criteria. Broadly speaking, the Copenhagen criteria require mem- ber states to exhibit an established market econ- omy, a stable democratic government, respect for human rights, and an appreciation for the rule of law. The accession process involves a series of negotiations in which current members evalu- ate the prospective state’s progress until they deem these criteria to be satisfied.


The finalization of Croatia’s accession treaty marks the near-end of an eight-year negotiation process. Croatia first applied for EU membership in 2003, but official negotiations did not com- mence until 2005, when the nation began coop- eration with the International Criminal Tribunal on Yugoslavia. Shortly after negotiations began, they were suspended due to a land dispute with Italy that lasted until 2006. A long-standing maritime border dispute with Slovenia again stalled the


discussions for several months in 2009. Talks re- sumed at the end of 2009, and continued until June 30, 2011, when EU member states conclud- ed that Croatia met all requirements and invited the nation to become the newest addition to the union.


Throughout the negotiation process, Croatia was required to adopt and implement a multitude of reforms in order to comply with the European Union’s economic, political, and social standards for accession. Upon conclusion of the negotia- tions, Jose Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission, applauded Croatian au- thorities for their hard work in reforming their gov- ernment to meet these standards, asserting that the negotiations were “hard but fair.” EU Com- missioner for Enlargement and European Neigh- bourhood Policy, Stefan Fuele, said Croatia had changed “tremendously” during the negotiation process, transforming into a “mature democracy based on the rule of law and into a functioning market economy.”


Barroso further noted that current member states “have full confidence in the Croatian authorities” to continue confronting issues that were particu- larly difficult for the former Soviet bloc country to reform: corruption, organized crime, and hu- man rights. Fuele stressed that his Commission would continue its strict, transparent approach to monitoring Croatia so that the nation will be able to fully assume the responsibilities of member- ship.


Some experts, however, criticized the accession process for its seeming disregard of the tradi- tionally strict EU requirements for rule of law and clean government. Noticeably absent from the text of the proposed treaty are “safeguard


ILSA Quarterly » volume 20 » issue 2 » December 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112