This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MAY/JUNE 2013


Rail


months, taking away some of the need to use desktop printers.” He adds: “The rail industry has been slow to move with mobile ticketing, but it is looking at setting standards and it is inevitable that this will come.” Evolvi’s Reeve agrees: “The market wants any journey to be fulfilled by a barcode on a mobile device or plain paper. But it’s difficult to do that with the limitations of the rail infrastructure.”


CALCULATING TRUE COST Unlike Evolvi, Thetrainline.com also deals with corporates direct, and is working with them to identify the true cost when they allow people to book tickets themselves – including missed opportunities to choose lower fares, and the cost of reimbursing expenses. Thetrainline.com’s head of account management, Clare Morrissey, says: “We definitely believe there is still growth in the market, as many clients still don’t mandate rail travel. When corporates


“The market wants any journey to be fulfilled by a barcode on a mobile device or plain paper – but it’s difficult to do that”


have our ‘cheapest ticket’ travel policy tool turned on, 84 per cent of purchases are for the cheapest ticket for that journey.” She adds: “Our app is now being extended to business bookings, but it is a mechanism to book tickets rather than a complete end-to-end business system.”


92


KEEP IT SIMPLE TMCs and buyers are happy with the savings and efficiencies offered by online booking systems, but express some frustration that rail is not as simple to book as air. HRG reached a milestone in the year ending November 2012 when, for the first time, it booked more rail tickets in the UK than air or hotels. HRG director of industry and fare distribution, Tony Berry, says: “It’s interesting to look at how competition between airlines and rail companies on UK domestic routes is evolving, with product enhancements and flexible price playing a key part, particularly in first class. UK business travellers prefer rail travel to air on routes of three hours or less, and


“WE ARE SORRY TO ANNOUNCE…”


UPHEAVAL IN THE GOVERNMENT’S franchising system for Britain’s railways could delay the industry-wide introduction of technology to make possible ticketing by mobiles and other smart devices. The Department for Transport (DFT) was found to be at fault in last year’s debacle over renewal of the key West Coast franchise, covering the main business routes from London to the West Midlands, the North West and Scotland. The franchise award to First Group was later rescinded, with incumbent Virgin Trains being allowed to continue. The fiasco – which will end up costing taxpayers tens of millions of pounds – has led to an ongoing review of the franchising system, and the announcement of a new timetable for franchises due to be renewed over the next couple of years. Although not formally announced, it now seems likely that the DFT will opt for shorter franchises of up to around eight years in future. Problems forecasting revenue growth further into the future arose with the West Coast franchise renewal, which was due to run for 14 years until 2026. But shorter franchises discourage train operators from the major


investment needed in new infrastructure, such as electronic barriers and ticket readers able to recognise mobile or smart tickets. The DFT has announced that another key business route, East


Coast, will be put out to franchise again by February 2015, having been effectively nationalised since 2009 when National Express walked away from the franchise. Virgin Trains will continue to run West Coast until April 2017, and several other major franchises have been extended while the DFT gets its act together. The Great Western franchise (First Group) will now run until July 2016 instead of ending this year. Evolvi’s trade relations director, Jon Reeve, comments: “Short-term franchises mitigate against the wider adoption of new ticket fulfilment techniques. Train operators will not want to spend a lot on infrastructure, or any other large capital expenditure, if their franchises only have a few years to run.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156