search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WESTMINSTER WATCH


WORDS GARETH MORGAN


HS2: POLITICS ON THE LINE


Looking at the Conservative leader hopefuls, the high speed train project’s second phase could be in doubt


I


T WILL NOT HAVE ESCAPED YOUR NOTICE that discipline has broken down somewhat in politics, particularly on the Conservative side where the “whip” is frequently ignored completely and Cabinet leaks like a sieve. We are at historic levels of indiscipline and it is only going to get worse, primarily because we are in the middle of an unofficial Conservative leadership contest. Theresa May has announced to colleagues that she will stand down at some point and only has until December 2019 until she could be subjected to another vote of No Confidence from MPs (one this time she is highly likely to lose). This was an opening shot for candidates across the party to start gearing up


their efforts by giving high-profile speeches, pulling together campaign teams and canvassing for support from MP colleagues. Speak to most active Conservatives and


they’ll tell you that the party membership has changed in the past year and they work on the assumption that the successor to May “must be a Leaver”. This may well be true (most frontrunners are on record as being Leavers or doing their best to seem like it) but there is another issue that is looking like being a defining one in the contest – HS2. Look at the list of potential contenders and you’ll see a number on record as being against the scheme; Andrea Leadsom (”vanity project”), Jacob Rees-Mogg (“pull the plug”), Boris Johnson (“other projects… ought to take precedence”), Esther McVey


(“huge waste of money”). Others, such as Michael Gove, are against it in private and Liz Truss, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury (herself a leadership contender), has indicated that it will be looked at as part of the Spending Review this year. Consider also the grassroots of the party (and also that the names above are positioning themselves for a membership vote). In 2017 the influential Conservative Home website presented party members with a list of possible Conservative policies and asked them to indicate, on a scale of 1-10, what priority they would give them. HS2 came 34th… out of 34.


The reasons for this dislike are broad – destruction of countryside (unfortunately for HS2 it cuts through a number of constituencies with high-profile MPs), money that could be used for the NHS or spent on local transport projects… or HS3… or east-west links. One thing is clear – very few senior MPs are willing to defend the project publicly. How terminal is this? Well for Phase 1


maybe not too much. Legislation has been passed for London-Birmingham, contracts signed and some works have begun. But for Phase 2 (to Manchester and Leeds) there could be real challenges ahead. The legislation for this phase is due to


WHICH NEW PM IS


GOING TO SPEND POLITICAL CAPITAL ON A SCHEME THAT IS SO UNLOVED?


enter Parliament in 2020, but to get to that stage requires political will. Which new PM is going to spend that political capital on a scheme that is so unloved? True, there are many promises made in campaigns that disappear when in office but the voices against the scheme are significant and there is relative silence from potential supporters. Something will need to change for HS2 to be delivered in the way envisaged when it was mooted in 2009. Since then its creators have exited the stage but its opponents are about to take on the main role.


Gareth Morgan is a political lobbyist and director at Cavendish Communications.


He is also an advisor to the GTMC, which represents travel management companies


52 MAY/JUNE 2019 buyingbusinesstravel.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152