search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Pulse


ITALY ONLINE SKS365


SKS365:


Greater protection for Italian players


G3 took the opportunity to sit down with Casino Beats Summit keynote speaker


Alexander Martin, CEO of SKS365, to discuss the future of an Italian gaming industry undergoing significant regulatory changes.


Italy's Ministry of the Economy and Finance is reported to have taken charge of a reorganisation plan to implement an overhaul of market safeguards. What's your take on:


a. a new central player registry. b. new ID verification measures.


c. 'territorial reorganisation', or the gradual reduction, of betting shops.


d. reduction in stake and win limits.


In general, we welcome the actions designed to provide greater protection for players. In our view, these are actions that, in addition to strengthening consumer protection, fully meet the needs of a market that is increasingly oriented towards integrated multi-channel. It is therefore important that technology also evolve to accompany this evolution and optimise the integration of online and retail offerings, in full respect of our consumers.


Regarding the new ID verification measures, we think they could give a further boost in the battle against money laundering, as they will allow the legal operators to make further controls and monitoring both in retail and online.


A potential reduction in supply needs to be addressed in an appropriate time horizon and should go hand in hand with the sustainability of the industry and be based on clear rules that allow us to plan with more certainty. At the same time, reducing the number of regulated shops could


potentially trigger the growth of non-regulated shops.


As a company, we are already at the forefront in the money laundering prevention since we established an independent Supervisory Board that works along with our legal, compliance and AML departments, overseeing our compliance efforts; therefore, we fully support all the measures that help us to fight the illegal activities that damage unnecessary the reputation at our sector.


About the "territorial issue” we recognise the


need for a shop reduction, but we are also aware of the necessity of a homogeneous and rational distribution of the gaming offer. As a company, we strongly believe in an approach that focuses on quality rather than quantity. In short, it's better to have a smaller number of shops, but all of them are highly qualified. Tis is the idea that has accompanied us over the last two years and that has led us to invest in the retail network in terms of shop design, product, technology, and security.


A potential further reduction in supply needs to be addressed in an appropriate time horizon and should go hand in hand with the sustainability of the industry and be based on clear and certain rules that allow us to plan with more certainty the business for the coming years. At the same time, reducing the number of regulated shops could potentially trigger the growth number of non-regulated shops by some operators.


Regarding the reduction of stakes and winnings which has already been introduced in other EU countries, we think it could increase public confidence in the industry. Te measure would certainly lead to a contraction in revenues in the short term, which we would consider acceptable if it were accompanied by an overall reform that would allow operators to plan their business.


NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA P121


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150